PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Fermentation· 2026Q1· Review

Oligosaccharide Production from Olive Oil Industry By-Products: A Comparative Review with Other Agro-Industrial Substrates

Ana Cordeiro, António M. Peres, Lígia R. Rodrigues, Cláudia Amorim

Short summary

Olive oil by-products like olive pomace (OLP) can be converted into oligosaccharides (OS) via physicochemical treatment, enzymatic hydrolysis, or direct fermentation, with direct fermentation offering integrated enzyme production and substrate conversion.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Olive oil by-products (OLP, EOLP, OLS) are viable substrates for oligosaccharide (OS) production.
  • Production methods include physicochemical treatment, enzymatic hydrolysis, and direct fermentation.
  • Direct fermentation integrates enzyme production and substrate conversion, but faces challenges in product control and recovery.
  • Xylosaccharides (XOS) have the strongest human evidence, while other OS mixtures require further validation.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Olive industry by-products, particularly olive pomace (OLP), extracted olive pomace (EOLP), and olive stones (OLS), are promising alternative substrates for oligosaccharide (OS) production, as their polysaccharides can be converted into OS by physicochemical treatment, enzymatic hydrolysis, or direct fermentation. However, OS mixtures and one-step strategies integrating enzyme production and substrate conversion remain underexplored. This review evaluates OLP, EOLP, and OLS as raw materials for producing XOS-rich and POS-related oligosaccharides, as well as OS mixtures with prebiotic and technological potential, emphasising direct fermentation. A structured literature mapping was used to compare substrate types, product classes, and production strategies. Conventional physicochemical and enzymatic strategies are compared with the emerging direct fermentation strategy in terms of substrate accessibility, OS yield, degree of polymerisation, product composition, downstream requirements. Physicochemical processes enable rapid solubilisation but require careful control to limit over-depolymerisation, whereas enzymatic hydrolysis provides greater selectivity but depends on substrate accessibility and enzyme inputs. Direct fermentation integrates enzyme production and substrate conversion, although product control and recovery remain challenging. Human evidence is strongest for XOS, while POS and OS mixtures require direct validation. Further progress requires linking substrate composition and process selection to product standardisation, biological validation, and application-oriented testing.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Fermentation, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Nutrition and Dietetics

Nutrition and DieteticsNursing