Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine· 2026Q1· Review
Management of shift work disorder: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine systematic review, meta-analysis, and GRADE assessment
- 1citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A systematic review of 118 studies found that treatments for shift work disorder (SWD) show varying degrees of effectiveness in managing sleepiness and circadian adaptation, with recommendations guided by GRADE assessments.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- A systematic review analyzed 118 studies on treatments for shift work disorder (SWD).
- Evidence was gathered from randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and treatment trials.
- Treatments for excessive sleepiness, sleep disturbance, and circadian adaptation were evaluated.
- The GRADE process was applied to assess evidence quality and inform recommendations.
- Clinical relevance was determined using statistically significant outcomes and predefined thresholds.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
The purpose of this systematic review is to provide supporting evidence for a clinical practice guideline on the treatment of adults with shift work disorder (SWD). The American Academy of Sleep Medicine commissioned a task force of six experts in sleep and circadian medicine. A systematic review was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and treatment trials in which treatments for the symptoms of excessive sleepiness and/or sleep disturbance/insomnia in adults with SWD, and for circadian adaptation to shift work schedules was tested. Evidence from controlled laboratory trials of simulated shift work and of field-based trials of shift workers with and without a diagnosis of SWD was included. Statistical analyses were performed to determine the significance of critical and important outcomes and clinically meaningful thresholds were set to determine the clinical relevance of treatments on the outcomes examined, where possible. Finally, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) process was used to assess the evidence for making recommendations. The literature search resulted in 3,045 articles; 118 studies provided data suitable for statistical analyses. The task force provided a detailed summary of the evidence along with the quality of evidence, the balance of benefits and harms, patient values and preferences, and resource use considerations.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Experimental and Cognitive PsychologyPsychology