Periodontology 2000· 2016Q1· Review
Implant placement post extraction in esthetic single tooth sites: when immediate, when early, when late?
- 488citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2016year
Short summary
A review of implant placement strategies in post-extraction esthetic single tooth sites indicates that while immediate placement was popular, a focus on esthetic outcomes reveals risks of mucosal recession. Current knowledge of tissue biology post-extraction informs selection criteria for immediate, early, or late placement based on preoperative analysis, including CBCT.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Immediate implant placement in post-extraction esthetic sites carries a risk of mucosal recession.
- Understanding of tissue biology post-extraction has improved, explaining esthetic complications.
- Current strategies involve selecting immediate, early, or late implant placement based on preoperative analysis.
- 3D cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is crucial for preoperative analysis and treatment selection.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Implant placement in post-extraction sites of single teeth in the esthetic zone has been a topic of great interest in the field of implant dentistry since 1990. Triggered by the development of guided bone regeneration, the concept of immediate implant placement became quite popular in the 1990s. In the past 12 years, however, the dental community has begun to focus increasingly on the esthetic outcomes of post-extraction implant placement and several studies indicated a significant risk for the development of mucosal recessions with immediate implants. Parallel with this, significant progress has been made in the understanding of tissue biology in terms of hard and soft tissue alterations post extraction, based on preclinical, clinical and radiological studies. This knowledge has helped better to understand the etiology of these esthetic complications with immediate implant placement. The present review first analyzes the various phases of the development of therapeutic strategies over the years for post-extraction implant placement in single tooth sites in the esthetic zone. It presents the current knowledge concerning the terminology with immediate, early and late implant placement, the risk factors for the development of esthetic complications, and the selection criteria for the various treatment options. In the second part, clinical recommendations are given, since a clinician active in this field of implant therapy can use all treatment options depending on the preoperative analysis including a 3D cone beam computed tomography. The selection criteria for all four treatment options are presented and documented with typical case reports to illustrate the current treatment approaches applied in daily practice.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Periodontology 2000, 2016 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Oral Surgery
Oral SurgeryDentistry