PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Pathogens· 2026Q1

Laboratory Diagnosis of Staphylococcus spp. Infections

Elisabete Machado

Short summary

This tutorial guides laboratory technicians and students through identifying Staphylococcus species from clinical samples using phenotypic methods, with a focus on biochemical tests, and discusses automated systems and molecular methods as complementary approaches.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Provides a practical, step-by-step guide for identifying Staphylococcus species from clinical samples.
  • Focuses on phenotypic identification using biochemical tests, including abbreviated algorithms.
  • Discusses commercial semi-automated and automated phenotypic identification systems.
  • Briefly covers molecular methods (proteotypic and genotypic) as alternative or complementary approaches.
  • Highlights the continued importance of phenotypic methods as backup strategies.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Staphylococcus spp. are among the most common human pathogens identified from clinical samples in microbiology laboratories. S. aureus is the most clinically relevant species, followed by some coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp. (CoNS) such as S. saprophyticus and, to a lesser extent, S. epidermidis, S. haemolyticus, and S. lugdunensis. Different methods are available for the laboratory diagnosis of Staphylococcus spp. infections. The aim of this tutorial is to provide a practical approach for students and laboratory technicians to identify Staphylococcus species from clinical samples, guiding the step-by-step execution using abbreviated algorithms for phenotypic identification and presenting guidance for when to perform additional miscellaneous tests or pursue other microorganisms. Commercial semi-automated and automated phenotypic identification systems are also addressed, as they can speed up identification, particularly of CoNS species. Finally, molecular methods (proteotypic and genotypic) are briefly discussed as alternative or complementary approaches to identification by conventional or automated phenotypic methods. Despite the advantages of molecular methods, it is highly unlikely they will replace biochemical tests entirely, as phenotypic methods (mainly biochemical test-based methods) will remain as backup identification strategies when the latest technology fails. Therefore, future technicians in the field still have to be taught and gain experience with these older, valuable methods.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Pathogens, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Clinical Biochemistry

Clinical BiochemistryBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology