Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology· 2026Q2
Distributed Sample Allocation for the Diagnosis of Mass Lesions by EUS-FNA
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Distributing samples during EUS-FNA significantly increases diagnostic accuracy from 88.31% to 96.34% compared to nondistributed allocation.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Distributed sample allocation increased EUS-FNA diagnostic accuracy from 88.31% to 96.34% in a study of 248 patients.
- The improvement in diagnostic accuracy with distributed allocation was statistically significant (P=0.0262).
- Distributed allocation particularly improved accuracy for mediastinal and lung lesions (P=0.0128).
- Cystic solid lesions also showed improved diagnostic rates with distributed sample allocation (P=0.0235).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA)is a well-established, minimally invasive, interventional diagnostic endoscopic technique for the identification of mass lesions; however, its diagnostic accuracy needs further improvement. Most previous studies have focused on the choice of puncture techniques, and rare studies have investigated the effect of distributed sample allocation on the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA. In this study, we aim to investigate the effect of distributed versus nondistributed sample allocation on EUS-FNA diagnostic accuracy. Methods: A total of 248 patients with mass lesions indicated by previous imaging examination were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups: distributed and nondistributed sample allocation. Clinicopathological features were collected retrospectively and analyzed. Results: Distributed sample allocation can raise the overall EUS-FNA diagnostic accuracy from 88.31% (nondistributed preservation) to 96.34% (distributed preservation). Distributed sample allocation was effective to further increase EUS-FNA diagnostic accuracy ( P =0.0262). Furthermore, for lesions of different locations, the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA of lesions in the mediastinum and lung has improved ( P =0.0128). For lesions of different echogenicity, distributed allocation has effectively improved the diagnostic rate in cystic solid lesions ( P =0.0235). Conclusion: As a rarely considered approach, distributed sample allocation can improve the overall diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Pulmonary and Respiratory MedicineMedicine