PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Education Sciences· 2026Q1· Review

Can Generative Artificial Intelligence Effectively Enhance Students’ Mathematics Learning Outcomes?—A Meta-Analysis of Empirical Studies from 2023 to 2025

Baoxin Liu, Wenlan Zhang, Fangfang Wang

Short summary

A meta-analysis of 22 studies (N=5232) found Generative AI (GenAI) has a moderate positive impact (g=0.534) on students' mathematics learning outcomes, particularly when used in creative transformation modes and for geometry.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • GenAI shows a moderate positive impact (g=0.534) on students' mathematics learning outcomes across 22 studies (N=5232).
  • The effect is strongest with 'creative transformation' integration and for geometry learning.
  • Smaller sample sizes and collaborative learning approaches further enhance GenAI's positive impact.
  • Evidence certainty is higher for cognitive outcomes compared to non-cognitive domains.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) shows transformative potential in mathematics education. However, empirical findings remain inconsistent, and a systematic synthesis of its effects across distinct engagement dimensions is lacking. This preregistered meta-analysis (INPLASY2025110051) systematically reviewed 22 empirical studies (46 independent samples, N = 5232) published between 2023 and 2025. The results indicated that GenAI has a moderate positive impact on students’ mathematics learning outcomes (g = 0.534). Moderation analysis further revealed that the level of GenAI integration in teaching, sample size, and learning content are the primary factors influencing this effect. The study found that the effect was most pronounced under the creative transformation (CT) integration mode, was significant when applied to geometry learning, and was stronger in studies with small samples or small class sizes; collaborative learning approaches also significantly enhance these mathematics learning outcomes. By contrast, educational stage and intervention duration did not show significant moderating effects. The GRADE assessment indicated that while the overall evidence is supportive, the certainty of evidence is stronger for cognitive outcomes than for non-cognitive domains. The findings also offer a reference for future research on constructing a human–machine collaborative learning environment.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Education Sciences, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Information Systems

Information SystemsComputer Science