PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Critical Care· 2026Q1

Development and evaluation of a blood transfusion prediction algorithm tailored for precision and utility in civilian and military trauma patients

Erhan Pisirir, Sankalp Tandle, Jared M. Wohlgemut, Rebecca S. Stoner et al.

Short summary

A novel Bayesian network model predicts blood transfusion volume and timing in trauma patients using early injury and physiological data, achieving AUROC of 0.82-0.94 and 95% agreement with expert assessments.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Developed a Bayesian network model to predict blood transfusion volume and timing in trauma patients.
  • Model uses early injury and physiological variables available shortly after trauma.
  • Validated on a large dataset (n=15,708) with AUROC values of 0.82–0.94 for binary outcomes.
  • Achieved high accuracy for volume predictions (Ranked Probability Scores of 0.07 and 0.04) and 95% agreement with expert assessments.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Early decisions regarding blood transfusion in trauma are time-critical and made under substantial uncertainty. Existing prediction models typically classify patients using fixed thresholds and do not estimate the volume or timing of transfusion. This limits their utility for real-time clinical decision-making and resource planning. We developed and validated a Bayesian network model, informed by domain knowledge and clinical data, to predict transfusion requirements in trauma using injury and physiological variables available early after injury. The model estimates transfusion volume across multiple timeframes (2, 6, 12, and 24 h). It was developed using data from a prospective civilian cohort and military trauma registries ( n = 2361) and evaluated using internal cross-validation and external validation in an independent dataset ( n = 13,347). The model achieved AUROC values of 0·82–0·94 for binary outcomes across timeframes. For ordinal volume predictions, Ranked Probability Scores were 0·07 for 0–12 h predictions and 0·04 for 12–24 h predictions. In scenario-based evaluation, agreement with model predictions was observed in 213 of 225 (95%) expert assessments. Prediction models based on binary thresholds may have limited impact on clinical decision-making despite good performance. A decision-support approach that estimates transfusion requirements by volume and timing, using early-available clinical data, may provide more clinically useful decision support in trauma care.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Critical Care, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Critical Care and Intensive Care MedicineMedicine