PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Cleaner Production· 2017Q1· Review

Green, circular, bio economy: A comparative analysis of sustainability avenues

Dalia D’Amato, Nils Droste, B. Allen, Marianne Kettunen et al.

Short summary

A bibliometric review of nearly two thousand articles reveals that Green Economy acts as an 'umbrella' concept for sustainability, encompassing elements of Circular Economy and Bioeconomy, while all three concepts remain limited in their challenge to economic growth.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Green Economy is identified as an 'umbrella' concept for environmental sustainability, incorporating elements of Circular and Bioeconomy.
  • Circular Economy and Bioeconomy primarily focus on resource management.
  • Green Economy acknowledges the broader role of ecological processes beyond just resources.
  • All three concepts show limitations in challenging the paradigm of economic growth.
  • The study analyzed nearly two thousand scientific articles published over three decades.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Despite their evidently different assumptions and operationalization strategies, the concepts of Circular Economy, Green Economy and Bioeconomy are joined by the common ideal to reconcile economic, environmental and social goals. The three concepts are currently mainstreamed in academia and policy making as key sustainability avenues, but a comparative analysis of such concepts is missing. The aim of this article is thus to comprehensively analyse the diversity within and between such concepts. The results are drawn from a bibliometric review of almost two thousand scientific articles published within the last three decades, coupled with a conceptual analysis. We find that, for what concerns environmental sustainability, Green Economy acts as an 'umbrella' concept, including elements from Circular Economy and Bioeconomy concepts (e.g. eco-efficiency; renewables), as well as additional ideas, e.g. nature-based solutions. In particular, Circular Economy and Bioeconomy are resource-focused, whereas in principle Green Economy acknowledges the underpinning role of all ecological processes. Regarding the social dimension, Green Economy is more inclusive of some aspects at local level (e.g. eco-tourism, education), while there is an emerging discussion in Bioeconomy literature around local processes in terms of biosecurity and rural policies. When considering weak/strong sustainability visions, all concepts remain limited in questioning economic growth. By comparing the different sustainability strategies promoted by these concepts we do not advocate for their substitutability, but for their clarification and reciprocal integration. The findings are discussed in light of the concepts' synergies and limits, with the purpose to inform research and policy implementation. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

General Agricultural and Biological SciencesAgricultural and Biological Sciences