PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Geodynamics & Tectonophysics· 2026Q2

AMPHIBOLE-CLINOPYROXENE-PHLOGOPITE CUMULATES IN CARBONATITE BRECCIAS IN THE KOLA ALKALINE PROVINCE: A RECORD OF THE EVOLUTION OF ALKALINE-ULTRAMAFIC MELTS IN INTERMEDIATE CHAMBERS

Nataliya M. Lebedeva, Anna Andreevna Nosova, Alexey Vladimirovich Kargin, Alexey A. Vozniak et al.

Short summary

Amphibole-clinopyroxene-phlogopite macrocrysts in Kola Province carbonatite breccias are entrained cumulates formed in intermediate chambers at 5-7 kbar and ~1070°C, not phenocrysts from the host melt.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Macrocrysts in Kola Province carbonatite breccias are cumulates formed in intermediate chambers, not phenocrysts from the host melt.
  • Formation conditions for these cumulates were 5-7 kbar and approximately 1070°C.
  • Mineral zonation is reaction-based, not from fractional crystallization.
  • Sr-Nd isotopic data indicate a genetic link between carbonatite and alkaline-ultramafic melts.
  • Melt source is likely Neoproterozoic MARID-type veins, not Paleoproterozoic subduction zones.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

The study of the amphibole-clinopyroxene-phlogopite macrocryst association in carbonatites from the Kola Alkaline Province is of key importance for deciphering the evolution of alkali–ultramafic melts in intermediate magma chambers and for elucidating the nature of the amphibole-bearing mantle source. This paper presents the results of a comprehensive petrographic, mineralogical (SEM, EMPA), geochemical (XRF, ICP-MS), and Sr-Nd isotopic (TIMS) investigation of multiphase dykes of amphibole carbonatites from the Kola Province (Niva River estuary, Kandalaksha town, Murmansk region).The studied dykes (378.6±3.8 Ma, Rb-Sr isochron age) represent multiphase bodies up to 1 m in thickness. The bulk volume of the dykes is composed of carbonatite breccias containing macrocrysts and intergrowths of clinopyroxene, phlogopite, and amphibole, with amphibole being the predominant phase. It has been established that the macrocrysts do not represent phenocrysts crystallized from the host melt, but rather constitute entrained cumulate material formed in intermediate crustal chambers at 5–7 kbar and ~1070 °C during the evolution of alkali–ultramafic melts and subsequently captured by the carbonatite melt.The observed zonation in the macrocrysts is not related to fractional crystallization but is of reaction origin. The presence of mineral populations with discrete compositions (characterized by sharp contacts and an absence of diffusion controlled zoning) indicates a short-term interaction between the original cumulates and new batches of high-Mg# and oxidized alkali–ultramafic melts immediately prior to entrapment by the carbonatite magma. The established Sr-Nd isotopic equilibrium between the macrocrysts and the carbonate matrix points to their genetic relationship and suggests that the carbonatite and alkali–ultramafic melts are products of the evolution of a single magmatic system.The model age T DM (Nd) of the carbonatite breccias, not exceeding 700 Ma, precludes a Paleoproterozoic (1.9–1.7 Ga) subduction-related metasomatized mantle as a direct source of the melts. The most likely source is represented by amphibole pyroxenite veins of the MARID type, formed in the lithospheric mantle during a Neoproterozoic (700–570 Ma) magmatic pulse in Fennoscandia.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

GeophysicsEarth and Planetary Sciences