PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research· 2026Q1

Sentence Completion Expressive Language Task–Preschool: Preliminary Evidence of Validity and Feasibility for the Neuroimaging Environment

Karla Nadine Washington, Leslie E. Kokotek, Mekibib Altaye, Jennifer J. Vannest et al.

Short summary

The Sentence Completion Expressive Language Task–Preschool (SCELT-P) and its revised 20-item version (SCELT-PR) demonstrate strong reliability and validity for assessing expressive language in 4- to 5-year-olds, including those with DLD, and are feasible for use within a neuroimaging environment.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • The SCELT-P and SCELT-PR show high reliability (interrater ICC=.99, test-retest r=.80-.86) and strong criterion validity (r=.53-.84) in preschoolers.
  • The task demonstrated fair sensitivity (.85-.88) and specificity (.85) for differentiating TD from DLD preschoolers.
  • 89% of TD and 60% of DLD preschoolers successfully completed the SCELT-P/R within a neuroimaging setting.
  • The SCELT-P/R is a reliable and valid tool for assessing language production in 4- to 5-year-olds during neuroimaging studies.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Purpose: This preliminary investigation occurred across two studies and examined validity, discriminant accuracy, and feasibility of the Sentence Completion Expressive Language Task–Preschool (SCELT-P) for characterizing language production in a neuroimaging environment for typically developing (TD) preschoolers and those with developmental language disorder (DLD). Method: Two separate studies were completed. Study 1 (validity) included 82 preschoolers (50% female; 69 TD, 13 DLD) aged 4;0 (years;months) to 5;11 ( M age = 4;7). All children were assessed using standardized language measures (e.g., Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals Preschool–Second Edition), a play-based language sample (analyzed using Developmental Sentence Scoring), and the 30-item SCELT-P (outside the neuroimaging environment), later streamlined to 20 items (SCELT-P Revised [SCELT-PR]). Study 2 (feasibility) included 14 preschoolers ( M age = 4;9, 43% female; nine TD, five with DLD) that were assessed using the SCELT-P (inside the neuroimaging environment) and functional magnetic resonance imaging using a sparse acquisition approach with a “listen” (passive) and “listen + speak” (active) condition implemented using DirectRT software. Results: In Study 1, the SCELT-P and SCELT-PR demonstrated high reliability, including interrater (intraclass correlation coefficient = .99), test–retest ( r = .86 and .80, respectively), and internal consistency (Cronbach's α > .86 and .83, respectively), and similar strong criterion validity ( r = . 53–.84). Area under the curve analyses (.91) revealed both versions also evidenced fair sensitivity (.88 and .87) and specificity (.85) rates with a cutoff score of 15.5 and 9.5, respectively. In Study 2, 89% of TD preschoolers and 60% of preschoolers with DLD successfully completed the SCELT-P/R inside the neuroimaging environment, with activation maps illustrating relatively similar neurobiological characteristics across preschoolers in some brain regions. Conclusion: The SCELT-P, including its streamlined version, the SCELT-PR, holds promise as a reliable and valid task for including 4- to 5-year-olds in the neuroimaging environment to inform neural and cognitive systems involved in language development. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.34543209

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Developmental and Educational Psychology

Developmental and Educational PsychologyPsychology