Infrastructures· 2026Q2
Drop-Weight Impact Response of Self-Compacting Concrete Slabs Reinforced with Industrial, Recycled and Hybrid Steel Fibres
- 1citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Reinforcing self-compacting concrete (SCC) slabs with industrial (ISF), recycled (RSF), or hybrid steel fibres prevented perforation and rear-face scabbing under drop-weight impact, unlike plain SCC.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Plain SCC slabs perforated and scabbed under drop-weight impact.
- All tested steel fibre reinforcements (ISF, RSF, hybrid) prevented perforation and scabbing.
- ISF slabs exhibited the smallest peak and terminal residual deflections.
- Peak contact forces for fibre-reinforced slabs (256-286 kN) were significantly higher than for plain SCC (110 kN).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
This study compares the drop-weight impact response of self-compacting concrete (SCC) slabs with industrial (ISF), recycled tyre-derived (RSF), and hybrid ISF–RSF steel-fibre reinforcement. Four 1200 × 1200 × 100 mm slabs were tested at 28 days: plain SCC and slabs containing 90 kg/m3 ISF, 90 kg/m3 RSF, or 45 kg/m3 of each. A 105 kg projectile was released from 4.0 m (nominal potential energy 4.12 kJ). Damage, mean underside deflection, contact force and local acceleration were recorded. The plain slab perforated and developed rear-face scabbing; none of the fibre-reinforced slabs exhibited these failure modes under the investigated condition. The ISF slab showed the smallest peak and terminal residual average deflections, while the hybrid slab exhibited the largest peak and the RSF slab the largest terminal residual deflection. Peak contact forces were 285.83, 256.52 and 258.00 kN for ISF, hybrid and RSF, compared with 110.00 kN for plain SCC. Because one slab represented each mixture and matrix compositions varied, the comparisons are descriptive and do not isolate fibre-type effects or establish energy-absorption capacities or design values.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Infrastructures, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Civil and Structural Engineering
Civil and Structural EngineeringEngineering