Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence· 2026Q1
Data-driven seismic fragility and risk evaluation of existing reinforced-concrete bridge portfolios under limited data
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Gaussian Process Regression accurately predicts seismic fragility parameters (median intensity measure, logarithmic dispersion, ultimate displacement capacity) for reinforced-concrete bridges using routine inventory data, achieving R 2 >0.9.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Gaussian Process Regression accurately predicts seismic fragility parameters (μ, β, du) for reinforced-concrete bridges (R 2 >0.9).
- Models map routine inventory descriptors to fragility parameters, reducing data requirements.
- Risk evaluation and prioritization of 25 A19 motorway bridges were achieved with lower computational effort than benchmark methods.
- The approach offers intra-class granularity for transparent, scalable prioritization compared to qualitative methods.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Preliminary screening of existing transport infrastructure networks is essential to support timely maintenance and retrofit decisions, improve structural resilience, and reduce the economic and environmental impacts of severe damage, failure, and inefficient resource allocation. This study investigates a machine-learning-based pathway for quantitative, simplified seismic risk screening of typologically homogeneous reinforced-concrete girder-bridge portfolios under limited data, in accordance with the Italian Guidelines for existing bridges. Fragility labels are derived through a streamlined cloud-analysis benchmark for 75 simply supported reinforced-concrete lattice-girder bridges, yielding the lognormal fragility parameters: median intensity measure μ , logarithmic dispersion β , and ultimate displacement capacity d u . Supervised regression models are trained to map routinely available inventory descriptors, including geometric and mechanical proxies, to ( μ , β , d u ) . Among the tested models, Gaussian Process Regression provides the best balance between accuracy and stability in the small-sample regime, with cross-validated R 2 values close to 0.9 for all targets. The selected surrogate is applied to 10 additional bridge configurations to assess predictive capability on new cases. Finally, inferred fragility is coupled with site-specific seismic hazard to compute the mean annual frequency of exceedance λ , used to rank 25 bridges of the A19 motorway network in Sicily. Results show prioritization closely consistent with the cloud-analysis benchmark, while requiring substantially lower computational effort. Compared with qualitative guideline-based classes of attention, λ offers useful intra-class granularity for transparent, scalable prioritization. Limitations include reduced accuracy outside the training manifold, typology-specific validation, and lack of explicit condition and defectiveness features.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Civil and Structural Engineering
Civil and Structural EngineeringEngineering