PofoliaShared via Pofolia

International Journal of Retina and Vitreous· 2026Q1

Automated retinal disease classification from optical coherence tomography images using deep learning

Bashar A. Al Zuabi, Zain Al Abdeen Al Zuabi, Mohamed A. Azim, Ahmed AbdelMoety et al.

Short summary

A deep learning framework achieved high accuracy (93.05%) in classifying seven retinal diseases from OCT images, with the Xception model outperforming others in overall classification and ResNet50 excelling in discrimination and calibration.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • A deep learning framework was developed to classify seven retinal diseases (AMD, DME, ERM, normal, RAO, RVO, VID) from 2064 OCT images.
  • Eight CNN architectures were evaluated, with Xception achieving the best overall accuracy (93.05%) and balanced accuracy (87.39%).
  • ResNet50 achieved a high macro AUROC of 0.99021 and the lowest calibrated Expected Calibration Error (ECE) of 0.02171.
  • Performance varied by disease category, with dominant classes like AMD performing better than minority classes.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Purpose To develop and comparatively evaluate a reproducible Deep Learning (DL) framework for automated multiclass retinal disease classification from Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) images in a retrospective comparative diagnostic accuracy study. Method A publicly available OCT dataset containing 2064 images from 820 patients was used to classify seven diagnostic categories: Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD), Diabetic Macular Edema (DME), Epiretinal Membrane (ERM), normal retina, Retinal Artery Occlusion (RAO), Retinal Vein Occlusion (RVO) and Vitreomacular Interface Disease (VID). To avoid data leakage, the dataset was partitioned at the patient level into training (1481 images; 592 patients), validation (281 images; 105 patients) and test (302 images; 123 patients) sets. Eight Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architectures (InceptionV3, VGG16, MobileNetV2, AlexNet, EfficientNetV2B2, ResNet50, DenseNet121 and Xception) were trained within the same experimental pipeline using pretrained weights, weighted cross-entropy loss, Adaptive Moment Estimation with decoupled weight decay (AdamW) optimisation, early stopping and checkpointing. Performance was assessed using overall accuracy, balanced accuracy, macro Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC), per-class precision, recall and F1-score, confusion matrices and Expected Calibration Error (ECE), with temperature scaling applied for probability calibration. Results All evaluated models demonstrated strong diagnostic performance on the patient-disjoint test set. Xception achieved the best overall classification results, with 93.05% accuracy and 87.39% balanced accuracy. ResNet50 and DenseNet121 also performed strongly, achieving accuracies of 91.72% and 91.39%, respectively, with macro AUROC values above 0.98. ResNet50 produced the highest macro AUROC (0.99021) and the lowest calibrated ECE (0.02171), indicating strong discrimination and reliable probability estimates. Per-class analysis showed better performance for dominant categories such as AMD and normal retina, whereas minority classes remained more challenging. Conclusions A reproducible DL framework for OCT-based retinal disease classification was developed and shown to perform effectively across seven retinal diagnostic categories. Among the evaluated architectures, Xception provided the best overall classification performance, while ResNet50 offered the strongest discrimination and calibration. These findings support the potential of DL as a reliable tool for automated retinal disease detection from OCT images. Clinical trial number Not applicable.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. International Journal of Retina and Vitreous, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and ImagingMedicine