Cereal Chemistry· 2026Q2
Optimizing Instant Rice Quality of Milled and Brown Rice Through Cultivar‐Selection
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
X16 (long-grain hybrid) and Y3 (long-grain pureline) were identified as the top-performing rice cultivars for instant rice production, showing superior rehydration and texture compared to others.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Cultivar and grain form (milled vs. brown) significantly affect instant rice quality attributes (p < 0.05).
- Brown instant rice exhibited lower rehydration and volume increase but higher hardness compared to milled instant rice.
- Principal component analysis explained 61.4% of variance in milled and 48.5% in brown instant rice quality.
- X16 (long-grain hybrid) and Y3 (long-grain pureline) were identified as the best cultivars for milled and brown instant rice, respectively.
- Cultivar Y5 and Y6 (medium-grain pureline) underperformed in key quality traits.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
ABSTRACT Background and Objectives Instant rice products are increasingly favored for convenience; however, achieving consistent quality, particularly rehydration performance and texture, remains a challenge. Rice cultivars differ in physicochemical properties that influence processing behavior and final product quality, yet systematic screening approaches for instant rice optimization are limited. This study evaluated the instantization potential of 25 rice cultivars (hybrid and pureline; medium and long grain) in milled and brown forms to identify those most suitable for instant rice processing. Parameters measured included amylose and protein contents, gelatinization temperature (GT), cooking duration (CD), percentage point moisture removal (ΔMC %), texture, rehydration ratio, volume increase ratio (VIR), bulk density, whiteness index, and water activity ( a w ). Findings Cultivar and grain form (milled vs. brown) influenced nearly all instant rice quality attributes ( p < 0.05). Breeding type was not a major main effect for instant rice quality except through a grain form‐breeding type interaction that affected ΔMC (%) during stepwise hot‐air drying (SHAD) ( p < 0.05). Brown instant rice showed lower rehydration and VIR but greater hardness than milled instant rice. Principal component analysis (PCA) explained 61.4% of the variance in milled instant rice quality and 48.5% in brown. Based on multi‐attribute optimization, X16 (long‐grain hybrid) and Y3 (long‐grain pureline) were identified as the top‐performing cultivars among milled and brown rice, respectively (actual names are coded). Cultivars Y5 and Y6 (medium‐grain pureline) underperformed in key quality traits across both grain forms (actual names are coded). Conclusions These findings indicate that instantization performance depended more on cultivar and grain form than breeding type. Overall, screening results demonstrated clear cultivar differences in instantization performance for both milled and brown rice forms. Significance and Novelty These results provide practical guidance for processors in selecting cultivars with favorable physicochemical profiles to produce instant rice with improved and more consistent quality. Cultivar selection is often based primarily on agronomic performance and milling yield, whereas processing suitability receives less attention.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Cereal Chemistry, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Nutrition and Dietetics
Nutrition and DieteticsNursing