PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Creativity and Innovation Management· 2026Q1

Making Meets Informal Innovation: Formalisation, Access and Openness in Indian Makerspaces

Gautam Sharma

Short summary

Indian makerspaces, while appearing open, actively mediate between informal, need-driven innovation and institutionalized entrepreneurial pathways, creating new boundaries for participation and knowledge exchange.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Indian makerspaces mediate between informal innovation and institutionalized entrepreneurial pathways.
  • These spaces create new limits for participation, expertise, and knowledge exchange.
  • Openness in these makerspaces is a result of governance, not an inherent characteristic.
  • The study uses qualitative data from semi-structured interviews in Indian makerspaces and fablabs.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Makerspaces and fabrication labs (fablabs) are inclusive and open infrastructures. They democratise access to tools and technologies and facilitate bottom‐up innovation. Research on these spaces thus highlights the importance of openness, community orientation and the ability to foster informal experimentation that these spaces enable. In this paper, I examine how these features have been operationalised in contexts characterised by a high degree of economic and institutional informality by focusing specifically on Indian makerspaces and fablabs. I ask how these spaces relate to need‐driven local innovation practices and how they are sustained. The paper uses qualitative data collected through semi‐structured interviews and analyses the organisation of access, learning and innovation in these spaces. The analysis indicates that makerspaces and fablabs in India do not work as open infrastructures in their entirety. Instead, they serve as mediators between informal innovation practices and institutionalised pathways shaped by an entrepreneurial discourse. The analysis further indicates that they create new limits of participation, expertise and knowledge exchange. The paper contributes to the body of literature on open infrastructures and informal innovations by reconceptualising the notion of openness as a result of governance rather than as a characteristic of such spaces.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Creativity and Innovation Management, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Business and International Management

Business and International ManagementBusiness, Management and Accounting