PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation· 2026Q1

Integrated Multilevel Analysis of Surface Electromyography to Analyse Neuromuscular Patterns in Temporomandibular Disorders

Chiara Valenti, Amirhossein Rahbar, Paolo Betti, Elisabetta Carli et al.

Short summary

Surface electromyography (sEMG) metrics, specifically Surface Muscle Index (SMI) and Barycentre (BAR), revealed significant differences in neuromuscular patterns between myogenous TMD patients and healthy subjects, with lower values observed in the myogenous group.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • SMI and BAR sEMG indices were significantly lower in myogenous TMD patients compared to healthy subjects (p=0.007 and p=0.001).
  • IMPACT showed a borderline association with group differences (p=0.052).
  • Categorical analyses revealed significant differences in POC TA side, torsional predominance, and IMPACT status across groups.
  • SMI demonstrated strong correlations with BAR (r=0.83) and TORS (r=0.74), indicating functional organization.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Surface electromyography (sEMG) has been proposed as a non‐invasive tool to evaluate masticatory function in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD). However, functional indices remain insufficiently characterised. Objective To compare sEMG indices among myogenous and arthrogenous TMD and healthy subjects and explore their relationships. Methods This cross‐sectional study included 116 myogenous, 68 arthrogenous and 25 healthy subjects. Surface Muscle Index (SMI), Percentage Overlapping Coefficient of anterior temporalis (POC TA) and of masseter muscles (POC MM), Barycentre (BAR), Torsion (TORS), IMPACT and asymmetry were analysed. Kruskal–Wallis tests were used, followed by Dunn's post hoc tests with Holm correction. Effect sizes were estimated using eta‐squared based on the H statistic. Directional and status‐based categorical variables were compared using chi‐square or Fisher's exact tests. Inter‐metric associations were explored using Spearman correlation coefficients and exploratory principal component analysis (PCA). Results Only SMI and BAR showed significant between‐group differences (Holm‐corrected p = 0.007 and p = 0.001, respectively), with lower values in the myogenous group. IMPACT showed a borderline association with the group ( p = 0.052). Categorical analyses revealed significant between‐group differences for POC TA side and torsional predominance and IMPACT status. Correlation analysis showed that SMI was strongly associated with BAR ( r = 0.83) and TORS ( r = 0.74), suggesting a functional organisation. Conclusions SMI and BAR were informative for characterising group‐level functional differences, particularly those involving the myogenous group. Selected categorical functional patterns, particularly torsional and IMPACT status, differed across groups. These findings support the potential of sEMG metrics in functional characterisation of TMD phenotypes, particularly in myogenous TMD.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Complementary and Manual Therapy

Complementary and Manual TherapyHealth Professions