PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Biomedicines· 2025Q1

Machine Learning-Enabled Medical Devices Authorized by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2024: Regulatory Characteristics, Predicate Lineage, and Transparency Reporting

Bassel Almarie, Luis Fernando González-González, Lucas Antônio dos Santos Barbosa, Amelie M. Lutz et al.

Short summary

In 2024, the FDA authorized 168 ML-enabled medical devices, with 97.5% of 510(k) cleared devices citing an identifiable predicate (median age 2.2 years), but only 29.2% reported both sensitivity and specificity, and 15.5% provided demographic data.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • The FDA authorized 168 ML-enabled Class II medical devices in 2024, with radiology dominating approvals (74.4%).
  • Most devices (94.6%) were cleared via 510(k), with 97.5% citing an identifiable predicate (median age 2.2 years).
  • Only 29.2% of devices reported both sensitivity and specificity, and 15.5% provided demographic data.
  • Predetermined Change Control Plans (PCCPs) were included in 16.7% of device summaries.
  • Median review time was 162 days, significantly longer for De Novo (372 days) than 510(k) (151 days) clearances.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Background: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorized over 690 machine learning (ML)-enabled medical devices between 1995 and 2023. In 2024, new guidance enabled the inclusion of Predetermined Change Control Plans (PCCPs), raising expectations for transparency, equity, and safety under the Good Machine Learning Practice (GMLP) framework. Objective: The objective was to assess regulatory pathways, predicate lineage, demographic transparency, performance reporting, and PCCP uptake among ML-enabled devices approved by the FDA in 2024. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of all FDA-authorized ML-enabled devices in 2024. Data extracted from FDA summaries included regulatory pathway, predicate genealogy, performance metrics, demographic disclosures, PCCPs, and cybersecurity statements. Descriptive and nonparametric statistics were used. Results: The FDA authorized 168 ML-enabled Class II devices in 2024. Most (94.6%) were cleared via 510(k); 5.4% were cleared via De Novo. Radiology dominated (74.4%), followed by cardiovascular (6.5%) and neurology (6.0%). Non-US sponsors accounted for 57.7% of clearances. Among 159 510(k) devices, 97.5% cited an identifiable predicate; the median predicate age was 2.2 years (IQR 1.2–4.1), and 64.5% ML-enabled. Predicate reuse remained uncommon (9.9%). Median review time was 162 days (151 days for 510(k) vs. 372 days De Novo; p < 0.001). A total of 49 devices (29.2%) reported both sensitivity and specificity; 15.5% provided demographic data. PCCPs appeared in 16.7% of summaries, and cybersecurity considerations appeared in 54.2%. Conclusions: While 2024 marked a record year for ML-enabled device approvals and internationalization, uptake of PCCPs and transparent performance and demographic reporting remained limited. Policy efforts to standardize disclosures and strengthen post market oversight are critical for realizing the promises of GMLP.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Biomedicines, 2025 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Health Information Management

Health Information ManagementHealth Professions