TURKISH JOURNAL OF BIOLOGY· 2025Q2· Review
A systematic review of machine learning in heart disease prediction
- 63citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2025year
Short summary
Machine learning models, particularly ensemble methods on structured data and deep learning on unstructured data (ECG, imaging), show high accuracy in heart disease prediction, but a significant gap hinders clinical translation due to lack of external validation, reliance on limited datasets, and model interpretability issues.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Ensemble learning models dominate heart disease prediction on structured data, achieving high benchmark accuracy.
- Deep learning is increasingly used for unstructured data like ECG signals and cardiac imaging.
- A significant translational gap exists due to lack of external validation and reliance on limited public datasets.
- The 'black-box' nature of complex models reduces clinical trust, with explainable AI emerging as a key trend.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Background/aim: Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are a leading cause of global mortality, prompting the need for advanced predictive tools. While machine learning (ML) offers a powerful solution, there are significant challenges to clinical translation. This systematic review synthesizes the current state of ML in heart disease prediction, evaluating algorithmic performance, data utilization, and key translational challenges. Materials and methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of literature published up to 2025 was conducted. From an initial pool of over 2500 records, a rigorous screening process yielded 65 studies for in-depth qualitative synthesis. Results: Analysis showed that ensemble learning models dominate prediction tasks on structured data, achieving high accuracy on benchmarks. Deep learning (DL) is increasingly applied to unstructured data like electrocardiogram signals and cardiac imaging. Despite high performance reported in models, a significant translational gap exists. This is driven by a pervasive lack of external validation, an overreliance on limited public datasets, and the black-box nature of complex models that reduces clinical trust. The adoption of explainable artificial intelligence is a key trend aimed at mitigating these challenges. Conclusion: While ML shows significant potential, its utility remains largely confined to academic settings. The future of the field depends on a fundamental research shift, rather than on incremental accuracy gains. Progress requires a concerted focus on robust external validation, the development of large-scale representative datasets, and the creation of interpretable systems that can be effectively integrated into clinical workflows to improve patient outcomes.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. TURKISH JOURNAL OF BIOLOGY, 2025 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Health Information Management
Health Information ManagementHealth Professions