PofoliaShared via Pofolia

New Political Economy· 2026Q1

Globalised but divided: European corporations and the EU’s geoeconomic turn against China

Julian Germann, Steve Rolf, Joseph Baines, Sean Kenji Starrs

Short summary

A minority of European corporations, represented by the European Round Table for Industry (ERT), are deeply integrated into China's market and supply chains, hindering their alignment with the EU's 'geoeconomic turn' against China.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • The European Round Table for Industry (ERT) is a key forum of corporate executives closely linked to the European Commission.
  • Since the EU branded China a 'systemic rival', the Commission's posture has hardened, creating a disjuncture with the ERT's more tentative approach.
  • Analysis of ERT firms' integration with China shows a minority deeply integrated, a small group with minimal ties, and a large array of partially integrated companies.
  • This internal division within the ERT explains its passive role in shaping the EU's stance on China.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

The European Union’s ‘geoeconomic turn’ against China is hotly debated among international political economy scholars, but the role of Europe’s leading corporations in this shift remains underexplored. This article focuses on the European Round Table for Industry, an elite forum of corporate executives tightly connected to the European Commission. The ERT played a key role in aligning European integration with corporate interests from the 1980s to 2000s. However, it has fallen out of step with the European Commission, whose posture has hardened since branding China a ‘systemic rival’. The disjuncture between the Commission’s assertive stance and the ERT’s more tentative approach to China prompts us to test and rethink what we know about state-business relations in a new geoeconomic age. Drawing on data under-used in IPE to chart ERT firms’ ‘territorial’ and ‘network integration’ with China, our analysis reveals a significant minority of firms deeply integrated into the Chinese market and supplier base, a small group of firms with minimal ties potentially receptive to the EU’s ‘geoeconomic turn’, and a large array of partially integrated companies in between these two positions. This uneasy balance of forces within the ERT explains why it is trailing rather than driving the EU’s stance.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. New Political Economy, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Political Science and International Relations

Political Science and International RelationsSocial Sciences