Marine Policy· 2026Q1
Applying CITES for sea cucumber conservation: A structured review across the Indo-Pacific
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Sea cucumber conservation under CITES Appendix II shows highly variable implementation across the Indo-Pacific, with some nations delaying or banning trade while others continue with incomplete documentation, yet implementation can drive improvements in fisheries management.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Implementation of CITES Appendix II for sea cucumbers varies greatly across Indo-Pacific nations.
- Non-Detriment Findings (NDFs) range from data-driven stock assessments to qualitative, precautionary approaches.
- Trade was delayed or banned in some countries, while others continued with incomplete CITES documentation.
- CITES implementation has demonstrably improved fisheries administration, data collection, and governance in certain instances.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
International trade regulation under CITES is increasingly used as a market-based mechanism to conserve marine invertebrates, yet implementation of trade provisions remains heterogeneous across regions and taxa. This review evaluates the implementation of CITES Appendix II listings for sea cucumbers with a focus on the Indo-Pacific region. Using a structured review of published and grey literature, contextualised with export data, we examined the preparation of Non‑Detriment Findings (NDFs) and reported trade of sea cucumbers. We assessed the types of data, analytical depth, and technical guidance used in the development of NDFs among countries. We found substantial variation across CITES Parties within the Indo-Pacific region in the structure and evidentiary basis of NDFs, with some Parties relying on empirical stock assessments while others applied precautionary frameworks based on historical or qualitative information, reflecting differences in national context and capacity. For some CITES Parties, trade was delayed or banned, while in others it continued without complete CITES documentation. Despite these gaps, we identify cases where implementation of Appendix II requirements was associated with changes in fisheries administration, data collection or governance processes. These findings suggest that CITES processes can strengthen the administrative and institutional dimensions of national management when legal mandates are matched by scientific, technical, administrative and enforcement capacity, with adequate financial resources to support robust delivery of CITES provisions.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Marine Policy, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Aquatic Science
Aquatic ScienceAgricultural and Biological Sciences