Journal of Economic Surveys· 2026Q1
Bridging Micro and Macro Sustainability: How Sustainable Finance Connects Corporate esg to Sustainable Development Goals
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A scientometric analysis of 1,024 publications reveals that while sustainable finance is conceptualized as linking firm-level ESG to broader development outcomes, the field remains theoretically fragmented with limited integrated mapping of micro-SF-macro linkages.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Analyzed 1,024 Scopus-indexed publications (2004-2025) on sustainable finance using scientometric and bibliometric techniques.
- Identified 13 keyword clusters (e.g., green finance, ESG performance, climate policy) and 6 thematic clusters linking firm actions to macro sustainability.
- Found that sustainable finance is conceptualized as a link between micro-level ESG and macro-level sustainable development.
- Highlighted limited theoretical and methodological coherence within the field despite its growth.
- Outlined future research directions including disclosure harmonization, causal identification, and policy alignment.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
ABSTRACT Sustainable finance (SF) has increasingly been conceptualized in the literature as a mechanism linking firm‐level ESG practices to broader sustainable development outcomes. However, the field remains theoretically fragmented, with limited integrated mapping of micro–SF–macro linkages. Using scientometric and bibliometric techniques, this study analyzes 1,024 Scopus‐indexed publications (2004–2025) through performance analysis, keyword co‐occurrence, text mining, and bibliographic coupling. Thirteen keyword clusters reveal the intellectual structure of the field, spanning green finance, ESG performance, governance, climate policy, and energy transition. Bibliographic coupling identifies six thematic clusters that suggest how sustainable finance is theorized to link firm‐level actions with macro‐level sustainability transformations. Despite rapid post–Paris Agreement growth, theoretical and methodological coherence remains limited. The study outlines future research directions, emphasizing disclosure harmonization, causal identification, innovation–policy alignment, and multi‐level approaches. Accordingly, the findings capture patterns in the literature rather than empirically verified causal relationships.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Economic Surveys, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Finance
FinanceEconomics, Econometrics and Finance