Discover Education· 2026Q2
Readiness for adopting outcome-based education in higher education institutions in Mogadishu, Somalia
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Assessment readiness (β = 0.321) and institutional readiness (β = 0.177) are the strongest predictors of outcome-based education (OBE) adoption readiness in Mogadishu higher education institutions, with technological readiness also significant (β = 0.145).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Assessment readiness is the strongest predictor of OBE adoption readiness (β = 0.321, p < 0.001).
- Institutional readiness (β = 0.177, p = 0.001) and technological readiness (β = 0.145, p = 0.038) also significantly predict OBE adoption readiness.
- Faculty readiness (β = −0.030, p = 0.643) and curriculum readiness (β = 0.092, p = 0.126) were not statistically significant.
- The model explained 22.8% of the variance in OBE adoption readiness among 293 academic staff.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Outcome-based education (OBE) has become an important framework for strengthening educational quality, graduate competencies, curriculum alignment, and accountability in higher education. However, limited empirical evidence exists on institutional readiness for OBE adoption in post-conflict higher education contexts such as Somalia. This study examined the associations between institutional readiness, faculty readiness, curriculum readiness, assessment readiness, technological readiness, and OBE adoption readiness in Mogadishu, Somalia. A quantitative cross-sectional survey design was employed, and data were collected from 293 academic staff, including lecturers, heads of departments, deans, and quality assurance officers. The data were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) with SmartPLS 4. Assessment readiness had the largest estimated positive association with OBE adoption readiness (β = 0.321, p < 0.001), followed by institutional readiness (β = 0.177, p = 0.001) and technological readiness (β = 0.145, p = 0.038). Curriculum readiness (β = 0.092, p = 0.126) and faculty readiness (β = −0.030, p = 0.643) were not statistically significant. The model explained 22.8% of the variance in OBE adoption readiness. The study integrates organizational change capacity and educational alignment within one analytical framework, providing evidence on their independent associations with perceived preparedness before OBE adoption. The findings provide a basis for reviewing assessment practices, institutional coordination, technological support, faculty development, and curriculum alignment. However, the cross-sectional design, purposive sampling, and absence of a linear-model predictive benchmark limit causal, generalizability, and comparative predictive claims. Not applicable.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Discover Education, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Media Technology
Media TechnologyEngineering