PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology· 2026Q1

Community Pharmacists' Perspectives and Experiences of Deprescribing in Québec, Canada: Findings From a Survey

Alexandre Campeau Calfat, Béatrice Martin, Caroline Sirois

Short summary

Most community pharmacists in Quebec (75%) initiate deprescribing monthly, driven by side effects and patient requests, yet billing for these services is inconsistent (around 50%) due to barriers like insufficient training (59%) and time constraints (31%).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • 75% of surveyed Quebec community pharmacists initiate deprescribing monthly.
  • Side effects (75%) and patient requests (60%) are the most common triggers for deprescribing.
  • Only 50% of pharmacists systematically bill for initial and follow-up deprescribing consultations.
  • Insufficient training (59%), reimbursement uncertainty (35%), and lack of time (31%) are major barriers to billing.
  • Integrated software (67%) is the most significant facilitator for deprescribing interventions.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Community pharmacists in Quebec can bill for deprescribing. However, uptake remains low. We aimed to explore how community pharmacists perceive and engage in deprescribing. METHODS: Community pharmacists were invited to complete an online survey through a pharmacists' social media group and a newsletter. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and univariate chi-square tests. RESULTS: Among 366 respondents, most were women (n = 269; 74%), worked full-time (n = 282; 77%), had time for clinical interventions (n = 223; 61%), while 53% (n = 193) had fewer than 11 years of experience. Three quarters (n = 271) reported initiating deprescribing at least monthly. Side effects (n = 273; 75%) and patients' requests (n = 220; 60%) were more common reasons for deprescribing. More than 70% (n = 268) reported that prescribers usually accepted recommendations. Initial and follow-up consultations were systematically billed by 50% (n = 183) and 48% (n = 174) of respondents, respectively. Deprescribing interventions and billing practices were more common among pharmacists with dedicated clinical time and those working full time (all p < 0.01). Main barriers to billing were insufficient training (n = 217; 59%), uncertainty about reimbursement eligibility (n = 127; 35%) and lack of time (n = 112; 31%). Integrated software was the most common facilitator (n = 246; 67%). CONCLUSION: Deprescribing was commonly reported among respondents and was often prompted by clinical concerns and patient requests. Billing uncertainties and time constraints remained important barriers, highlighting opportunities to better support deprescribing in community pharmacy.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Geriatrics and Gerontology

Geriatrics and GerontologyMedicine