BMC Biology· 2026Q1
A responsivity theory of call timing patterns in bat echolocation
- 6citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A new 'responsivity framework' mathematically links bat echolocation call timing to acoustic propagation, motion, and behavior, explaining phenomena like the terminal buzz and hyperbolic call-rate-distance relationships.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- The responsivity framework models echolocation call timing as an active-sensing cycle with acquisition and behavioral intervals, linked by a responsivity coefficient (k_r).
- k_r connects call timing to effective anchor distance, relative velocity, call duration, and echo window selection.
- The framework generates hyperbolic call-rate-distance relationships and explains the terminal buzz as a near-target limit of the timing process.
- Separable effects of responsivity and kinematics constrain terminal update density, call rate, and available time.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
ABSTRACT Background The temporal patterning of bat echolocation is extensively characterised, but a general mathematical account linking call timing to acoustic propagation, relative motion, and behaviourally selected information remains incomplete. Results We present the responsivity framework, which represents each call event as a delayed active-sensing cycle comprising an acoustic acquisition interval and a subsequent behavioural interval. Their proportional relation is described by the responsivity coefficient, k r , connecting call timing to effective anchor distance, relative velocity, call duration, and the selected echo window. Analytical derivation, call-by-call simulation, internal validation, and comparison with field recordings show how the framework generates hyperbolic call-rate–distance relationships, shifts approach timing with echo-window selection, and places the terminal buzz at the near-target limit of the same timing process. Responsivity and kinematics have separable terminal effects: k r constrains terminal update density and attainable call rate, whereas closing velocity determines the time available within the terminal region. A buzz-readiness state precedes the complete expression of buzz, and transient sonar strobe groups emerge under multi-target anchor allocation without an explicit grouping rule. Field recordings show broad correspondence with simulations in the organisation of movement, call timing and call duration, and illustrate conditional evaluation of acquisition-window and anchor assumptions. Conclusions Responsivity theory provides a process-based descriptor of echolocation timing and a diagnostic framework for hypothesis generation and empirical testing. The framework identifies the measurements needed to test how selected acoustic information governs subsequent call timing.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. BMC Biology, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and SystematicsAgricultural and Biological Sciences