Journal of Hunan University Natural Sciences· 2026Q2· Review
Evaluating medical device safety, equipment lifecycle management, and clinical technology optimization in health systems: a systematic review of primary research involving healthcare technology engineers, biomedical engineering specialists, and healthcare service engineers
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A systematic review of 10 primary reports reveals that engineering involvement in medical device lifecycle management leads to improved equipment performance and operational efficiency, with evidence of reduced out-of-service rates (e.g., 10.2% vs. 17.8% in Rwandan hospitals) and downtime (35% reduction in Jordan).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Engineering involvement in medical device lifecycle management improves equipment performance and operational efficiency.
- Trained technicians are associated with lower equipment out-of-service rates (10.2% vs. 17.8% in Rwandan hospitals).
- Structured maintenance and management processes can significantly reduce equipment downtime (e.g., 35% reduction reported).
- Predictive maintenance shows potential for substantial savings (up to 25% in one analyzer application).
- Evidence directly linking engineering interventions to patient outcomes remains limited.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract Background and objective: Safe medical technology depends on equipment selection, maintenance, repair, replacement, and professional oversight throughout its operational life. Evidence concerning engineering contributions is dispersed across workforce research, hospital improvement projects, and decision models. This review examines primary research addressing medical device safety, equipment lifecycle management, and clinical technology optimization involving healthcare engineering personnel. Methods: Ten primary reports published before the eligibility cutoff of 31 May 2026 were examined through narrative synthesis. Studies addressed technician training, failure analysis, maintenance processes, replacement prioritization, computerized management, and predictive analytics. Findings were organized by intervention, operational outcome, and relevance to clinical safety. Results: A Rwandan comparison reported equipment out of service at 10.2% in hospitals with trained technicians versus 17.8% in comparator hospitals, alongside higher technician productivity. A Jordanian improvement project reported a 35% reduction in downtime. Predictive maintenance research reported potential diagnostic and repair savings reaching 25% in one analyzer application. A Malaysian study classified maintenance and replacement priorities using records for 13,352 devices. Other reports demonstrated structured failure assessment, replacement ranking, inventory digitization, and lifecycle-specific maintenance planning. Outcomes primarily concerned equipment performance and management processes, limiting conclusions about patient harm. Conclusion: Engineering involvement supports organized maintenance, technical workforce development, and transparent lifecycle decisions. Evidence of operational benefit exceeds evidence of clinical benefit. Comparative evaluations linking engineering interventions with patient outcomes remain necessary. Keywords: Clinical engineering; biomedical engineering; medical device safety; equipment lifecycle; maintenance management; healthcare technology management.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Hunan University Natural Sciences, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Medical Laboratory TechnologyHealth Professions