PofoliaShared via Pofolia

European Geriatric Medicine· 2026Q1

Independence in activities of daily living for home-based geriatric rehabilitation after shortened inpatient rehabilitation: the “Better@Home” center prospective cohort study with a matched historical control group

Chris J. Gamble, M. Vaz, Margot W. M. de Waal, Wim G Groen et al.

Short summary

A home-based geriatric rehabilitation program, "Better@Home," which replaces part of inpatient care, resulted in comparable independence in activities of daily living (ADL) to traditional inpatient rehabilitation.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • The "Better@Home" program integrates home-based geriatric rehabilitation to replace a portion of inpatient care.
  • A prospective cohort study with a matched historical control group included 350 participants.
  • No significant difference in activities of daily living (ADL) independence was observed at discharge between the home-based and inpatient groups (mean Barthel Index difference: 0.48 points).
  • The study utilized Cox and linear mixed-effects (LMM) regression models for data analysis.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

PURPOSE: Population aging is increasing the demand for geriatric rehabilitation (GR). A transition towards home-based GR could potentially reduce the need for inpatient GR and better align rehabilitation with daily functioning at home. The aim of this study is to compare the level of independence in activities of daily living between patients receiving the "Better@Home" program and those undergoing conventional inpatient geriatric rehabilitation. METHODS: The Better@Home study is a multicenter prospective cohort study with a matched historical control group. Eight GR facilities in the Netherlands implemented the Better@Home program, which is a five-component intervention in which home-based GR replaces part of inpatient GR. Data was gathered at GR admission and discharge through semi-structured interviews, registration forms, and electronic patient files. The Better@Home group was compared with a matched historical control group receiving conventional inpatient GR on independence in activities of daily living (ADL), assessed by the Barthel Index (BI). Data was analyzed using a Cox and linear mixed-effects (LMM) regression model. RESULTS: A total of 350 participants were included (Better@Home n = 110; control n = 240). Groups were comparable on all characteristics at baseline. The LMM analysis found no significant difference between the Better@Home and the control group on independence in ADL at discharge (mean BI difference: 0.48 points, 95% CI -0.323-1.282; p = 0.240). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that a structured home-based GR program, replacing part of inpatient GR, can achieve comparable levels of independence in activities of daily living to conventional inpatient GR.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. European Geriatric Medicine, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and RehabilitationHealth Professions