PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Soil Systems· 2026Q1

Validation-Aware VNIR Spectroscopy Reveals Target-Specific Transferability of SOC, SIC, and Gypsum Predictions in Dryland Agricultural Soils

Wajdi Allagui, Hayfa Zayani, Luca Bernardini, Pascal Pichelin et al.

Short summary

VNIR spectroscopy can predict soil gypsum (R2=0.78), SOC (R2=0.44), and SIC (R2=0.30) in dryland soils, but model accuracy is highly dependent on validation strategy and target property, with SIC showing poor spatial transferability.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • VNIR spectroscopy can predict soil gypsum (R2=0.78), SOC (R2=0.44), and SIC (R2=0.30) in dryland agricultural soils.
  • Model performance is highly dependent on the validation strategy, with standard methods overestimating accuracy, particularly for SIC.
  • Spatial transferability of predictions is target-specific: gypsum and SOC models retained reasonable accuracy, while SIC models failed when validated at a broader spatial scale (oasis level).
  • Random Forest (RF) generally outperformed Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR) for SIC prediction.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Hyper-arid agricultural soils combine low organic carbon, high calcium carbonate contents, salinity, and frequent gypsum accumulation, making rapid quantification of soil organic carbon (SOC), soil inorganic carbon (SIC), and gypsum valuable but analytically demanding. We evaluated visible–near-infrared (VNIR) spectroscopy for predicting these three properties in 216 samples from 18 plots, nested within six oasis sites spanning two oasis management systems, three topographic positions, and six soil depths, with particular emphasis on how validation design affects apparent model accuracy. Partial least squares regression (PLSR) and random forest (RF), single- and multi-target workflows, and global versus stratified calibrations were compared using plot-blocked GroupKFold, site-blocked GroupKFold, random KFold, and leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV). Under continuum-removed spectra, RF outperformed PLSR for SIC, whereas the advantage for SOC and gypsum was not robust to plot or site-level resampling. Predictability was strongly target-specific: gypsum was predicted most reliably (R2 = 0.78), SOC moderately (R2 = 0.44), and SIC least reliably (R2 = 0.30). KFold and LOOCV generally yielded more optimistic estimates than plot-blocked GroupKFold, inflating SIC R2 by 0.15–0.20 for the global model and by up to 0.64 for topography-stratified models (pooled across strata). Site-blocked validation further showed that spatial transferability was strongly target-specific: SOC performance remained similar between plot-blocked and site-blocked validation (R2 = 0.41 and 0.43, respectively), gypsum performance declined moderately (R2 = 0.78 to 0.64), whereas SIC performance decreased markedly from R2 = 0.30 to −0.28, indicating poorer performance than a mean-based prediction under oasis-level blocking. VNIR spectroscopy therefore shows strong potential for gypsum, moderate utility for SOC, but limited transferability for SIC. Validation design, together with the spatial scale at which independence is imposed, critically determines how soil-spectroscopy performance should be interpreted for dryland monitoring.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Soil Systems, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Analytical Chemistry

Analytical ChemistryChemistry