PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Resources· 2026Q1

Co-Exploration: A Strategy for Integrating Alternative Geosciences Resources for the Petroleum Industry in an Energy Transition Context

Romulo de Araújo Matos, Alexandre Salem Szklo

Short summary

Co-exploration is a strategy for oil and gas companies to use their geoscientific skills to jointly assess geothermal energy, natural hydrogen, lithium, geological storage, and deep-sea mining, with geothermal and lithium showing the best balance of synergies and compatibility.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Co-exploration allows O&G companies to apply upstream geoscientific capabilities to new resources like geothermal, natural hydrogen, lithium, CCS, and deep-sea mining.
  • A compatibility matrix ranks alternatives based on synergies with O&G operations.
  • CCS and CO2-EOR have high operational synergies but depend on incentives and carbon markets.
  • Geothermal energy (EGS) and lithium from brines offer a balanced Co-exploration strategy with geoscientific and environmental compatibility.
  • Natural hydrogen has strategic alignment but low technological maturity; deep-sea mining is least viable despite strategic appeal.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

This study proposes the concept of Co-exploration as a diversification strategy that enables oil and gas (O&G) companies to leverage their geoscientific capabilities to jointly assess multiple resources, such as geothermal energy, natural hydrogen, lithium in brines, geological storage, and deep-sea mining. Those resources share a reliance on traditional upstream capabilities, including geological mapping, geophysical data acquisition and interpretation, reservoir characterization, modeling techniques, risk analysis, drilling, operations in remote environments, and the management of complex projects. A compatibility matrix was developed to summarize how well these alternatives fit a Co-exploration strategy. Alternatives such as CCS and CO2-EOR stand out for their technical and operational synergies with O&G upstream operations; however, they rely on tax incentives and an immature carbon market. Conversely, geothermal energy (EGS) and lithium production from brines represent more balanced alternatives for a Co-exploration strategy, combining geoscientific synergies, environmental and climate compatibility. Natural hydrogen offers strong strategic alignment but faces low technological maturity and market uncertainties. Finally, deep-sea mining emerges as the least viable alternative, despite its strategic appeal regarding the supply of critical elements. However, applying legacy O&G methods and tools is not straightforward. Alternative projects can differ from O&G projects in investment scale, time horizons, and risk-return profiles. There are also challenges associated with permitting, resource ownership, environmental and monitoring requirements, long-term liabilities, and social acceptance.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Resources, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the EnvironmentEnergy