PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of the American Chemical Society· 2013Q1

Benchmarking Heterogeneous Electrocatalysts for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction

Charles C. L. McCrory, Suho Jung, Jonas C. Peters, Thomas F. Jaramillo

Short summary

A standardized protocol for evaluating oxygen evolution electrocatalysts is introduced, using overpotential at 10 mA cm⁻² as a key metric. Most non-noble metal catalysts perform similarly in alkaline solutions but lack stability in acidic ones.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Introduced a standardized protocol for evaluating oxygen evolution electrocatalysts.
  • Key metric: overpotential to achieve 10 mA cm⁻² current density.
  • Non-noble metal catalysts (Co, Ni-based) showed similar performance in alkaline solutions (0.35-0.43 V overpotential).
  • All tested systems except IrO(x) were unstable in acidic solutions.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Objective evaluation of the activity of electrocatalysts for water oxidation is of fundamental importance for the development of promising energy conversion technologies including integrated solar water-splitting devices, water electrolyzers, and Li-air batteries. However, current methods employed to evaluate oxygen-evolving catalysts are not standardized, making it difficult to compare the activity and stability of these materials. We report a protocol for evaluating the activity, stability, and Faradaic efficiency of electrodeposited oxygen-evolving electrocatalysts. In particular, we focus on methods for determining electrochemically active surface area and measuring electrocatalytic activity and stability under conditions relevant to an integrated solar water-splitting device. Our primary figure of merit is the overpotential required to achieve a current density of 10 mA cm(-2) per geometric area, approximately the current density expected for a 10% efficient solar-to-fuels conversion device. Utilizing the aforementioned surface area measurements, one can determine electrocatalyst turnover frequencies. The reported protocol was used to examine the oxygen-evolution activity of the following systems in acidic and alkaline solutions: CoO(x), CoPi, CoFeO(x), NiO(x), NiCeO(x), NiCoO(x), NiCuO(x), NiFeO(x), and NiLaO(x). The oxygen-evolving activity of an electrodeposited IrO(x) catalyst was also investigated for comparison. Two general observations are made from comparing the catalytic performance of the OER catalysts investigated: (1) in alkaline solution, every non-noble metal system achieved 10 mA cm(-2) current densities at similar operating overpotentials between 0.35 and 0.43 V, and (2) every system but IrO(x) was unstable under oxidative conditions in acidic solutions.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2013 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the EnvironmentEnergy