PLOS Global Public Health· 2026Q1
Delivering balanced energy and protein (BEP) supplements to pregnant and breastfeeding women in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Home delivery of balanced energy and protein (BEP) supplements was favored by pregnant and breastfeeding women (PBW) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) over facility-based delivery, primarily due to integrated nutrition education and behavior change communication (BCC).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Home delivery was the most frequently mentioned platform for BEP supplements in LMICs (11/22 studies).
- Community feeding centers and ANC at health facilities were also identified as delivery platforms for BEP supplements.
- Pregnant and breastfeeding women preferred home delivery over facility-based delivery, citing integrated nutrition education and BCC.
- Limited evidence exists for market-based approaches for delivering BEP, IFA, or MMS supplements.
- Scaling up BEP through ANC, enhanced by community health workers and BCC, may be feasible.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
In settings where more than 20% of women of reproductive age are classified as underweight, the World Health Organization recommends balanced energy and protein (BEP) supplementation during pregnancy to reduce adverse birth outcomes. However, guidance on contextually acceptable and feasible supplement delivery platforms remains limited, posing critical challenges for implementation. We synthesized literature on acceptable and feasible delivery platforms for BEP supplementation (direct evidence), as well as iron and folic acid (IFA) or multiple micronutrient supplements (MMS; indirect evidence) to pregnant and breastfeeding women (PBW) to broaden the search scope. A systematic search was conducted across five databases and grey literature to identify studies that addressed the acceptability and feasibility of BEP supplement delivery platforms in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), at facility and community levels. We identified 48 studies conducted in LMICs: 22 specifically evaluated BEP supplement delivery, while 26 evaluated IFA or MMS. In the direct evidence, home delivery (11/22) was the most frequently mentioned delivery platforms of BEP supplements followed by community-level feeding centers (provided cooked meals or take-home rations) anchored by frontline community health workers (8/22 studies) and antenatal care (ANC) at health facilities (6/22; some studies assessed multiple delivery platforms). Only four studies assessed preferred BEP delivery platforms, and PBW favored home over facility-based delivery. Authors attributed this preference to the comprehensive nutrition education and behavior change communication (BCC) provided during home delivery. Indirect evidence showed that enhancing delivery of IFA or MMS at health facilities (not specific) through strategies such as BCC and home visits may improve supplement compliance. Overall, limited evidence exists regarding market-based approaches for delivering any of these interventions. Based on existing evidence, scale-up delivery of BEP supplementation through ANC at health centers, enhanced by community health workers may be feasible in reaching PBW, especially when combined with BCC.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. PLOS Global Public Health, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Nutrition and Dietetics
Nutrition and DieteticsNursing