PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Frontiers in Medicine· 2026Q1

Cognitive biases in nursing students' clinical decision-making: insights from high-fidelity simulation using think-aloud and observational methods

Naim Abdulmohdi

Short summary

A study of 23 nursing students found 166 instances of cognitive biases, such as representativeness and order effect, impacting clinical decision-making during high-fidelity patient simulations.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • 166 cognitive bias occurrences were identified in 23 nursing students during simulated patient deterioration scenarios.
  • Representativeness and order effect were the most frequently observed biases across think-aloud and observational data.
  • Cognitive biases occurred across both automated (Type 1) and analytical (Type 2) decision-making processes.
  • High-fidelity simulation combined with think-aloud methods effectively identified these biases.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Background Cognitive biases are systematic errors in human reasoning that can compromise clinical decision-making (CDM) in healthcare. While extensively studied in medicine, nursing research on cognitive biases in CDM remains limited. Aim This study aimed to explore and identify cognitive biases and examine their relationship with nursing students' clinical decision-making during a high-fidelity simulation of a deteriorating patient scenario. Design A mixed-methods design was employed, incorporating concurrent and retrospective think-aloud (TA) protocols and observational data. Methods Twenty-three final-year Bachelor of Science nursing students participated in a high-fidelity, manikin-based simulation involving a clinically deteriorating patient scenario. A catalogue of 12 cognitive biases was developed from the literature and used to code statements from concurrent and retrospective think-aloud protocols and observational data using content analysis. Results A total of 166 bias occurrences were identified across all data sources (63 concurrent TA; 51 retrospective TA; 52 observation). Representativeness was the most frequently identified bias overall, particularly in retrospective think-aloud data. Order effect was the most common bias in concurrent think-aloud data, and representativeness and order effect were the most common in observational data. Premature closure and availability were also prominent across all sources of data. Biases occurred proportionally across both Type 1 (automated/pattern recognition) and Type 2 (hypothetico-deductive) decision-making, with notable differences between concurrent and retrospective think-aloud findings. The findings also suggest that simulation may support students' awareness of cognitive bias. Conclusion High-fidelity simulation, combined with think-aloud protocols and observation, provided a useful approach for identifying cognitive biases in nursing students' clinical decision-making. The findings have implications for simulation design, debriefing practice, and nursing education.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Frontiers in Medicine, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Family Practice

Family PracticeMedicine