Horticultural Science and Technology· 2026Q2
Effects of Electrical Conductivity (EC) of System Water and Vapor Pressure Deficit (VPD) on the Physiological Responses and Flowering of Kalanchoe blossfeldiana in an Aquaponic System
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Increasing system water electrical conductivity (EC) from 0.5 to 1.5 dS•m⁻¹ in an aquaponic system had less impact on Kalanchoe blossfeldiana physiology and flowering than vapor pressure deficit (VPD), with higher VPD (1.18 kPa vs. 1.98-2.22 kPa) leading to 38.8-43% higher photosynthetic rates.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Vapor pressure deficit (VPD) had a stronger influence on Kalanchoe photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and transpiration than system water electrical conductivity (EC).
- Plants in a lower VPD environment (1.18 kPa) exhibited 38.8-43% higher photosynthetic rates compared to those in higher VPD conditions (1.98-2.22 kPa).
- Electrical conductivity levels of 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 dS•m⁻¹ in the aquaponic system did not significantly hinder physiological responses or flowering.
- Maximum photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) remained stable (0.81-0.83) across all treatments.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of system water electrical conductivity (EC) levels and the growing environment on the physiological responses (photosynthesis, SPAD value, and chlorophyll fluorescence), growth, and flowering characteristics of florist kalanchoe (Kalanchoe blossfeldiana) in a goldfish (Carassius auratus L.) aquaponic system over a time span of 140 days.The experiment was conducted at three EC levels (0.5, 1.0, and 1.5dS•m -1 ), which were maintained by regulating fish feeding rates (50% crude protein) without the addition of chemical fertilizers.During the experimental period, mean air temperatures were similar between the growth room and the control (22.4 and 22.8°C, respectively), whereas relative humidity was markedly higher in the growth room (57.7%) than in the control (32.7%), resulting in mean vapor pressure deficit (VPD) values of 1.18 and 1.98kPa, respectively, with the control peaking at 2.22-2.30kPaduring November-December.The pH of the system water remained stable within a range of 5.0-6.6, and EC was consistently maintained at designated levels without nutrient accumulation.The photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate were more strongly influenced by the VPD than by the EC level; despite the high VPD, a continuous water supply maintained stomatal opening in the control case, resulting in photosynthetic rates 38.8-43% higher than those of the EC 1.0 growth room treatment.The maximum photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) remained stable at 0.81-0.83across all treatments, and the performance index (PI_ ABS ) was highest in the control at 140 days after
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Horticultural Science and Technology, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Aquatic Science
Aquatic ScienceAgricultural and Biological Sciences