Scientific Reports· 2026Q1
Exploring the sustainable scaling of AI dilemma: a projective study of corporations’ AI environmental impacts
- 11citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A new methodology estimates corporate AI environmental impacts, forecasting a 24.4x rise in AI electricity consumption by 2030 under high adoption scenarios, and calls for standardized assessment and a 'Return on Environment' metric.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- A new methodology allows companies to estimate AI environmental impacts without deep AI or LCA expertise.
- AI electricity consumption may rise 24.4x by 2030 under high adoption scenarios, driven by generative AI.
- Mitigation requires coordinated efforts across the AI value chain, not just isolated efficiency gains.
- The study calls for standardized environmental assessment frameworks and a 'Return on Environment' metric.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
The rapid growth of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly Large Language Models (LLMs), raises environmental concerns extending beyond greenhouse gas emissions. Limited transparency from major providers hinders companies’ ability to evaluate their AI-related environmental impacts and achieve their net-zero targets. This paper proposes a methodology to estimate the environmental impact of a company’s AI portfolio, delivering actionable insights without requiring deep AI or Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) expertise. Using a modeling approach that incorporates increased AI usage, hardware efficiency, and electricity mix changes aligned with IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) scenarios, we forecast AI impacts through 2030. Under a high adoption scenario, driven by complex generative AI models and frameworks, AI electricity consumption could rise by a factor of 24.4. Mitigating this impact by 2030 demands coordinated efforts across the AI value chain. Isolated measures like hardware or model efficiency alone are insufficient. We call for standardized environmental assessment frameworks, increased transparency, and a “Return on Environment” metric to align AI development with sustainability goals.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Scientific Reports, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Electrical and Electronic EngineeringEngineering