PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Ceramics· 2026Q2

A Comparative Study of Electrical Conductivity and Dielectric Relaxation in Lithium- and Vanadium-Based P2O5–ZnO–CaO Phosphate Glasses

Vicente Compañ, Amel ABDALLAH, Chaker Bouzidi, Amal Bouich et al.

Short summary

Vanadium-based phosphate glasses (PZCV) exhibit DC conductivity one order of magnitude higher (1.5 × 10−9 S·cm−1 at 120 °C) than lithium-based glasses (PZCL, 1.8 × 10−10 S·cm−1), due to vanadate group integration into the phosphate backbone.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Vanadium-based glasses (PZCV) integrate vanadate groups into the phosphate backbone, while lithium-based glasses (PZCL) maintain an ultraphosphate structure.
  • PZCV shows DC conductivity of 1.5 × 10−9 S·cm−1 at 120 °C, one order of magnitude higher than PZCL (1.8 × 10−10 S·cm−1).
  • Activation energies are 0.89 eV for PZCV and 1.04 eV for PZCL, indicating easier charge transport in the vanadium-based glass.
  • Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy effectively distinguished conductivity relaxation from other polarization effects.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Phosphate glasses with the compositions 60P2O5–15ZnO–15CaO–10Li2O (PZCL) and 60P2O5–15ZnO–15CaO–10V2O5 (PZCV) (mol%, expressed as oxides) were synthesized by the melt-quenching method. The prepared glasses were characterized by using X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), Raman spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). X-ray diffraction shows only broad diffuse halos without Bragg reflections, indicating that both glasses are X-ray amorphous. Raman analysis confirms that PZCL behaves as a typical alkali-modified ultraphosphate glass containing Q3 and Q2 units, whereas PZCV contains characteristic V–O vibrational modes indicating that vanadate groups are integrated into the phosphate backbone. SEM observations reveal smooth surfaces at low magnification for both glasses; at higher magnification, PZCV shows a compact and homogeneous surface with fine, uniformly dispersed granules, whereas PZCL displays a more textured surface with agglomerates and plate-like features. EIS analysis using the Havriliak–Negami model reveals that the free-charge carrier contribution appears as a step in M′(ω,T) and a peak in M″(ω,T), allowing a clear distinction between conductivity relaxation and interfacial polarization or dipolar effects, with conductivity derived from the M″(ω,T) peak frequency. PZCV shows dc conductivity approximately one order of magnitude higher than PZCL (1.5 × 10−9 vs. 1.8 × 10−10 S·cm−1 at 120 °C). The temperature dependence follows Arrhenius behavior, with activation energies of about 0.89 eV for PZCV and 1.04 eV for PZCL. The electrode polarization observed at low frequencies with ion-blocking gold electrodes indicates a significant ionic contribution in both glasses, although a polaronic (V4+/V5+) contribution to the conductivity of PZCV cannot be excluded. Capacitance analysis reveals a slight increase with temperature for both samples, with PZCV consistently showing higher values (~7 pF) than PZCL (~5 pF). Although the absolute conductivities remain far below those required for practical solid electrolytes, these results clarify how the replacement of Li2O by V2O5 modifies charge transport and dielectric relaxation in P2O5-rich Zn–Ca phosphate glasses.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Ceramics, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Ceramics and Composites

Ceramics and CompositesMaterials Science