Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics· 2026Q1· Clinical trial
Clinical Trial: Capsule Sponge as a Non‐Endoscopic Monitoring Tool in Eosinophilic Oesophagitis—A Prospective Real–World Multicentre Study
- 1citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A prospective multicentre study found that a capsule sponge (CS) is a safe, feasible, and accurate non-endoscopic tool for monitoring eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE), achieving 84.8% overall accuracy with 76.3% sensitivity and 89.5% specificity compared to traditional biopsies.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- The capsule sponge (CS) achieved 84.8% overall diagnostic accuracy for monitoring EoE, with a sensitivity of 76.3% and specificity of 89.5% compared to endoscopic biopsies.
- CS swallowing success rate was high at 92.7% in 136 patients across three hospitals.
- Patient acceptability was very high, with 96.7% finding the CS acceptable, 78.8% preferring it over endoscopy, and 90.8% willing to repeat the procedure.
- No complications were reported during the study.
- The CS is presented as a safe, feasible, and accurate less-invasive tool for EoE monitoring.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory condition requiring repeat endoscopy and biopsy for histological monitoring, which is invasive, resource-intensive and burdensome for patients. The capsule sponge (CS) offers a potential non-invasive alternative. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy, feasibility and patient acceptability of CS versus endoscopic biopsies for monitoring disease activity in adult patients. METHODS: on endoscopic biopsy histology and CS respectively. Symptom burden was assessed using the Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire, endoscopic severity using the EoE Endoscopic Reference Score and patient acceptability via structured questionnaire. RESULTS: 136 patients (164 paired episodes) from three secondary care hospitals successfully swallowed CS with sufficient sampling; CS swallowing success rate was 92.7%. Median age was 45 years (IQR 34.8-56); 92/136 (67.6%) were male. CS demonstrated sensitivity 76.3%, specificity 89.5%, PPV 80.4%, NPV 87.0% and overall accuracy 84.8% (Cohen's κ = 0.67). AUC was 0.904 (95% CI 0.856-0.953). Patient acceptability recorded 96.7% found CS acceptable, 78.8% preferred it over endoscopy, and 90.8% would repeat the procedure. No complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: CS is a safe, feasible, accurate and highly acceptable less-invasive tool for monitoring EoE. Its implementation could improve care pathways, reducing the need for repeated endoscopic biopsies while maintaining diagnostic reliability, with potential to reduce service burden, carbon emissions and improve patient experience. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CoSiE: IRAS number: 314770; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06501274; QuBiE: UK Clinical Trial registry identifier: ISRCTN14071734; Trial number: 10083253.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Gastroenterology
GastroenterologyMedicine