PofoliaShared via Pofolia

The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice· 2026Q1· Review

Medical Treatment of CRS Before Escalation to Endoscopic Sinus Surgery or Biologics: A Critical Scoping Review

Francesca Pirola, Claire L Hopkins

Short summary

Intranasal corticosteroids and saline irrigations are the foundation of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) medical treatment, with systemic corticosteroids offering temporary benefit for CRS with nasal polyps but limited by adverse effects. Long-term systemic antibiotics, particularly macrolides, are not universally recommended before escalation, and topical antibiotics are for selected postoperative patients.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Intranasal corticosteroids and saline irrigations are the primary medical treatments for CRS.
  • Short courses of systemic corticosteroids may benefit CRS with nasal polyps but have significant cumulative adverse effects.
  • Prolonged systemic antibiotic therapy, including long-term macrolides, lacks consistent evidence and is not a universal prerequisite for escalation.
  • Topical antibiotics are useful in specific postoperative CRS patients, while antihistamines and immunotherapy are for allergic CRS.
  • Medical therapy should be individualized based on endotype and patient characteristics, not just sequential treatment failure.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a heterogeneous inflammatory disease in which medical treatment should be tailored to endotype, disease severity, and patient-specific factors. This review examines the evidence supporting medical therapy before escalation to endoscopic sinus surgery or biologics. Intranasal corticosteroids and saline irrigations remain the foundation of treatment. Short courses of systemic corticosteroids may provide temporary benefit in CRS with nasal polyps, but repeated exposure should be limited because of severe cumulative adverse effects. Evidence for prolonged systemic antibiotic therapy in CRS is inconsistent, and specifically long-term macrolides should not be considered a universal prerequisite before treatment escalation, particularly in type 2 inflammatory disease. Topical antibiotics may be useful in selected postoperative patients, while antihistamines and allergen immunotherapy should be reserved for patients with clinically relevant allergic disease rather than sensitization alone. Appropriate medical therapy should therefore reflect treatments with demonstrated benefit for the individual patient's endotype and characteristics, rather than require sequential failure of all available options. In patients with persistent uncontrolled disease, escalation to surgery or biologics should be guided by disease characteristics, comorbidities, prior treatment, treatment burden, and patient preference.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Otorhinolaryngology

OtorhinolaryngologyMedicine