PofoliaShared via Pofolia

PLoS ONE· 2012Q1

Composition and Similarity of Bovine Rumen Microbiota across Individual Animals

Elie Jami, Itzhak Mizrahi

Short summary

Bovine rumen bacterial communities show 51% similarity based on abundance and occurrence, but this rises to 82% when considering phylogenetic relationships, suggesting a core microbiome.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Rumen bacterial communities across 16 cows had 51% similarity by abundance/occurrence.
  • Phylogenetic analysis increased similarity to 82%, suggesting a core microbiome.
  • 32 bacterial genera were found in all sampled cows.
  • High variability in abundance of shared genera was observed.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

The bovine rumen houses a complex microbiota which is responsible for cattle's remarkable ability to convert indigestible plant mass into food products. Despite this ecosystem's enormous significance for humans, the composition and similarity of bacterial communities across different animals and the possible presence of some bacterial taxa in all animals' rumens have yet to be determined. We characterized the rumen bacterial populations of 16 individual lactating cows using tag amplicon pyrosequencing. Our data showed 51% similarity in bacterial taxa across samples when abundance and occurrence were analyzed using the Bray-Curtis metric. By adding taxon phylogeny to the analysis using a weighted UniFrac metric, the similarity increased to 82%. We also counted 32 genera that are shared by all samples, exhibiting high variability in abundance across samples. Taken together, our results suggest a core microbiome in the bovine rumen. Furthermore, although the bacterial taxa may vary considerably between cow rumens, they appear to be phylogenetically related. This suggests that the functional requirement imposed by the rumen ecological niche selects taxa that potentially share similar genetic features.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. PLoS ONE, 2012 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Agronomy and Crop Science

Agronomy and Crop ScienceAgricultural and Biological Sciences