The MIT Press eBooks· 2016
Rogue Archives
- 253citations
- 2016year
Short summary
Nonprofessional archivists, particularly media fans, are radically reshaping cultural preservation online by creating freely accessible digital archives of mass culture content.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Nonprofessional archivists (fans, pirates, hackers) are now key practitioners of cultural preservation online.
- Digital cultural memory differs radically from print-era archiving, with mass culture seen as a preservable archive.
- Fan fiction and remix culture are central genres of digital cultural production driven by these archivists.
- Online archives often follow performance logics and prioritize diverse content, serving specific communities like women and queer users.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
An examination of how nonprofessional archivists, especially media fans, practice cultural preservation on the Internet and how “digital cultural memory” differs radically from print-era archiving. The task of archiving was once entrusted only to museums, libraries, and other institutions that acted as repositories of culture in material form. But with the rise of digital networked media, a multitude of self-designated archivists—fans, pirates, hackers—have become practitioners of cultural preservation on the Internet. These nonprofessional archivists have democratized cultural memory, building freely accessible online archives of whatever content they consider suitable for digital preservation. In Rogue Archives, Abigail De Kosnik examines the practice of archiving in the transition from print to digital media, looking in particular at Internet fan fiction archives. De Kosnik explains that media users today regard all of mass culture as an archive, from which they can redeploy content for their own creations. Hence, “remix culture” and fan fiction are core genres of digital cultural production. De Kosnik explores, among other things, the anticanonical archiving styles of Internet preservationists; the volunteer labor of online archiving; how fan archives serve women and queer users as cultural resources; archivists' efforts to attract racially and sexually diverse content; and how digital archives adhere to the logics of performance more than the logics of print. She also considers the similarities and differences among free culture, free software, and fan communities, and uses digital humanities tools to quantify and visualize the size, user base, and rate of growth of several online fan archives.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. The MIT Press eBooks, 2016 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Conservation
ConservationArts and Humanities