BMC Health Services Research· 2018Q1· Review
Facilitators and barriers of implementing and delivering social prescribing services: a systematic review
- 238citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2018year
Short summary
A systematic review of 8 studies identified key factors facilitating and hindering the implementation of social prescribing services in general practice, including aspects of approach, agreements, leadership, management, staff, relationships, practice characteristics, and local infrastructure.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Social prescribing services, which connect patients with non-clinical needs to local community resources, face various implementation challenges.
- Facilitating factors include clear implementation approaches, strong leadership, effective management, staff engagement, and good inter-partner relationships.
- Barriers include issues with legal agreements, high staff turnover, poor communication, and characteristics of general practices or local infrastructure.
- The evidence base for social prescribing implementation is currently weak, with most included studies having poor methodological quality.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Social Prescribing is a service in primary care that involves the referral of patients with non-clinical needs to local services and activities provided by the third sector (community, voluntary, and social enterprise sector). Social Prescribing aims to promote partnership working between the health and the social sector to address the wider determinants of health. To date, there is a weak evidence base for Social Prescribing services. The objective of the review was to identify factors that facilitate and hinder the implementation and delivery of SP services based in general practice involving a navigator. METHODS: We searched eleven databases, the grey literature, and the reference lists of relevant studies to identify the barriers and facilitators to the implementation and delivery of Social Prescribing services in June and July 2016. Searches were limited to literature written in English. No date restrictions were applied. Findings were synthesised narratively, employing thematic analysis. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool Version 2011 was used to evaluate the methodological quality of included studies. RESULTS: Eight studies were included in the review. The synthesis identified a range of factors that facilitate and hinder the implementation and delivery of SP services. Facilitators and barriers were related to: the implementation approach, legal agreements, leadership, management and organisation, staff turnover, staff engagement, relationships and communication between partners and stakeholders, characteristics of general practices, and the local infrastructure. The quality of most included studies was poor and the review identified a lack of published literature on factors that facilitate and hinder the implementation and delivery of Social Prescribing services. CONCLUSION: The review identified a range of factors that facilitate and hinder the implementation and delivery of Social Prescribing services. Findings of this review provide an insight for commissioners, managers, and providers to guide the implementation and delivery of future Social Prescribing services. More high quality research and transparent reporting of findings is needed in this field.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. BMC Health Services Research, 2018 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Conservation
ConservationArts and Humanities