British Journal of General Practice· 2018Q1
Social prescribing: where is the evidence?
- 250citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2018year
Short summary
Social prescribing, a popular approach for GPs to address social needs impacting health, lacks a robust evidence base due to diverse models and evaluation challenges.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Social prescribing is advocated by major organizations to expand care options for GPs addressing social determinants of health.
- An estimated 20% of GP consultations are for primarily social issues.
- The concept has grown rapidly due to an aging population and increasing health/social needs.
- A significant challenge is the lack of a robust, unified evidence base for social prescribing.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Social prescribing is the topic of the moment. Many national organisations and individuals from policy, practice, and academia (such as NHS England, the RCGP, the Mayor of London, and National Institute for Health Research) are rightly advocating social prescriptions as an important way to expand the options available for GPs and other community-based practitioners to provide individualised care for people’s physical and mental health through social interventions. No robust figures exist but it is thought that around 20% of patients consult their GP for primarily social issues, given this and the driving forces of an ageing population, increased complex health and social needs, and increasing demand on services, social prescribing is rapidly gaining popularity.As a concept and a model for delivering health and social interventions, social prescribing has proliferated without a concomitant evidence base.1 This is partly due to resource limitations on evaluators and partly due to difficulties in conceptualising what social prescribing is and what good evidence for a complex service might look like. Here, we briefly outline different models of social prescribing, the current evidence base and its limitations, explore problems relating to what constitutes good evidence, and discuss some potential ways forward.An immediate difficulty is the range of activity that the term ‘social prescribing’ embraces. Such heterogeneity is a function of social prescribing being the demand-driven formalisation of referrals to existing community services and organisations, which is necessarily locally different. More generally, at one extreme there are narrow interventions that focus on one clinical area and aim to prevent or reduce progression to chronic disease. Such interventions tend to include targeted life-style interventions (for example physical activity, healthy eating or cooking), medicines management or group mentoring, and are typically accessed through the healthcare system. At the other extreme, a large number of schemes are …
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. British Journal of General Practice, 2018 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Conservation
ConservationArts and Humanities