PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume· 1983

The bucket-handle tear of the meniscus. A clinical and arthrographic study

D.T. Shakespeare, H.S. Rigby

Short summary

Arthrography identified significant meniscal tears in 77% of 187 cases, but often misdiagnosed tears hidden in the intercondylar notch as intact menisci.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Bucket-handle meniscus tears are often caused by simple twists or sports injuries, but 20% occur with no known trauma or only a history of crouching.
  • Most patients (43%) presented with a locked knee, and 37% had a history of locking.
  • Arthrography identified significant meniscal tears in 77% of 187 reported cases.
  • Diagnostic errors in arthrography occurred when displaced fragments were hidden in the intercondylar notch.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

A retrospective series of 272 operatively proven bucket-handle tears of the meniscus has been studied to define the natural history of the tear and to assess the accuracy of arthrography as a diagnostic technique. A simple twist, or a sporting injury accounted for most tears in the 196 patients on whom information was sufficient to allow analysis. There was, however, either no known trauma or merely a history of crouching in 20 per cent of patients. These were distributed evenly throughout the age range. Most of the 272 patients presented either with a locked knee (43 per cent) or with a history of locking (37 per cent). Fifty per cent of those with a previous history of locking but who were clinically unlocked at the time of operation, had displaced bucket-handle tears, indicating that unlocking of the knee joint frequently represents anterior extension of the tear, rather than relocation of the displaced fragment of meniscus. Significant meniscal tears were identified in 77 per cent of the 187 arthogram reports that were studied. Most errors in diagnosis seemed to occur when the separated fragment was hidden in the intercondylar notch and the peripheral rim was misinterpreted as an intact meniscus.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, 1983 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Surgery

SurgeryMedicine