Science Education· 2014Q1
“Not Designed for Us”: How Science Museums and Science Centers Socially Exclude Low‐Income, Minority Ethnic Groups
- 301citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2014year
Short summary
Science museums and centers socially exclude low-income, minority ethnic groups by implicitly expecting visitors to have prior scientific knowledge, specific language skills, and financial resources, reinforcing a sense of not belonging.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Science museums and centers implicitly expect visitors to possess certain levels of scientific knowledge, language skills, and financial means.
- These expectations create barriers for low-income and minority ethnic groups, leading to feelings of exclusion.
- Participants from diverse community groups (Sierra Leonean, Latin American, Somali, Asian) reported feeling that these institutions were "not for us."
- The study utilized qualitative data from focus groups, interviews, and accompanied visits to explore these exclusionary experiences.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
ABSTRACT This paper explores how people from low‐income, minority ethnic groups perceive and experience exclusion from informal science education (ISE) institutions, such as museums and science centers. Drawing on qualitative data from four focus groups, 32 interviews, four accompanied visits to ISE institutions, and field notes, this paper presents an analysis of exclusion from science learning opportunities during visits alongside participants’ attitudes, expectations, and conclusions about participation in ISE. Participants came from four community groups in central London: a Sierra Leonean group ( n = 21), a Latin American group ( n = 18), a Somali group ( n = 6), and an Asian group ( n = 13). Using a theoretical framework based on the work of Bourdieu, the analysis suggests ISE practices were grounded in expectations about visitors’ scientific knowledge, language skills, and finances in ways that were problematic for participants and excluded them from science learning opportunities. It is argued that ISE practices reinforced participants preexisting sense that museums and science centers were “not for us.” The paper concludes with a discussion of the findings in relation to previous research on participation in ISE and the potential for developing more inclusive informal science learning opportunities.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Science Education, 2014 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Museology
MuseologyArts and Humanities