PofoliaShared via Pofolia

American Sociological Review· 2015Q1

Working for Free in the VIP

Ashley Mears

Short summary

Unpaid women in VIP nightclubs perform valuable labor for promoters, who appropriate surplus value through recruitment, mobilization, performance, and control, framing their work as leisure and friendship.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Promoters extract surplus value from unpaid women in VIP nightclubs through four stages: recruitment, mobilization, performance, and control.
  • Relational work, including gifts and strategic intimacies, frames women's labor as leisure and friendship, masking its exploitative nature.
  • Boundary work distinguishes women's labor from sexual labor, legitimizing their participation.
  • Relational mismatches, where boundaries and meanings of relationships are misaligned, lead women to perceive the VIP party as work and reduce participation.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Why do workers participate in their own exploitation? This article moves beyond the situational production of consent that has dominated studies of the labor process and outlines the relational production of labor’s surplus value. Using a case of unpaid women who perform valuable work for VIP nightclubs, I present ethnographic data on the VIP party circuit from New York, the Hamptons, Miami, and Cannes, as well as 84 interviews with party organizers and guests. Party promoters, mostly male brokers, appropriate surplus value from women in four stages: recruitment, mobilization, performance, and control. Relational work between promoters and women, cemented by gifts and strategic intimacies, frames women’s labor as leisure and friendship, and boundary work legitimizes women’s work as distinct from sexual labor. When boundaries, media, and meanings of relationships do not appropriately align, as in relational mismatches, women experience the VIP party less as leisure and more as work, and they are less likely to participate. My findings embed the labor process in a relational infrastructure and hold insights for explaining why people work for free in culture and technology sectors of the post-Fordist economy.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. American Sociological Review, 2015 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Museology

MuseologyArts and Humanities