PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Education Sciences· 2026Q1

Developing Minority-Language Didactics Through Collaborative Action Research: A Didactic Model from Slovene-Medium Schools in Italy

Maja Melinc Mlekuž

Short summary

A two-dimensional didactic model was developed for Slovene-medium schools in Italy, addressing the challenge of pupils encountering Slovene primarily through schooling.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • A six-year collaborative action research process in Slovene-medium schools in Italy led to a new didactic model.
  • The model has two dimensions: a process dimension (sociolinguistic diagnosis to assessment alignment) and an instructional dimension (differentiation, adapted input, communicative integration, etc.).
  • The research involved retrospective documentary analysis of 36 sources, including 22 documents and 14 teaching units.
  • The model is designed for multilingual students in minority-language-medium education where the language of schooling is socially less dominant.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Slovene-medium schools in Italy are public schools in which Slovene is the language of instruction and the protected language of the Slovene national community, yet many pupils encounter Slovene mainly through schooling. This creates a didactic situation that cannot be adequately described as first-, second-, foreign- or heritage-language education. This article analyses how a minority-language didactic model was developed through a six-year collaborative action research process in Slovene-medium schools in Italy (2019–2025). Using retrospective documentary analysis, the study reconstructs four accredited professional development programmes (2019–2022) and subsequent phases of consultation, curriculum refinement, teaching-material development, documented practice-based revision and extension into assessment development. The bounded analytical corpus comprised 36 sources: 22 documentary sources and 14 teaching units. Qualitative analysis mapped the corpus chronologically, coded recurring didactic problems and compared outputs across cycles. Findings show a two-dimensional model: a process dimension connecting sociolinguistic diagnosis, collaborative professional learning, curriculum development, whole-school language support, material development, implementation and assessment alignment, and an instructional dimension based on differentiation, adapted input, contextualised grammar, communicative integration, scaffolding, formative feedback and school-wide language modelling. The article contributes an analytically transferable model for supporting multilingual students in minority-language-medium education where the language of schooling is socially less dominant outside school.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Education Sciences, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Linguistics and Language

Linguistics and LanguageSocial Sciences