PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Environmental Radioactivity· 2026Q2

Indoor radon exposure and ventilation-driven mitigation in a high-rise residential unit using source-term-informed monitored-zone assessment

Min-Jun Kim, Chang-Hyeon Kim, Won-Jun Jang, Jae‐Oh Shim

Short summary

Energy-recovery ventilators (ERVs) reduced indoor radon concentrations by up to 84% in a high-rise unit, with higher ventilation rates (0.7 ACH) yielding the fastest and most effective mitigation.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Paired pre-ERV radon concentrations in the unit ranged from 496 to 1010 Bq m⁻³.
  • ERV operation at 0.3, 0.5, and 0.7 ACH resulted in mean radon reductions of 79.2%, 81.5%, and 84.0%, respectively.
  • Higher ventilation rates (0.7 ACH) showed the highest mean reduction and shortest average response time.
  • A corner-to-center radon concentration difference of 18.6% was observed under closed-door conditions, indicating spatial non-uniformity.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Increasing airtightness in high-rise residential buildings can enhance indoor radon accumulation when persistent indoor source terms are combined with limited air exchange. This study evaluated indoor radon accumulation and ventilation-driven reduction in four monitored zones of one newly constructed high-rise residential unit using multi-point detector measurements during actual energy-recovery ventilator (ERV) operation at nominal settings of 0.3, 0.5, and 0.7 h −1 , complemented by chamber-derived surface-associated radon source information and zone-specific air volumes. Paired pre-ERV concentrations ranged from 496 to 1010 Bq m −3 . The combined mean detector-level reductions were 79.2%, 81.5%, and 84.0% at the three nominal settings, respectively. Relative to the 0.3 h −1 tests, the 0.5 h −1 tests had higher mean reductions and fewer residual detector locations above 148 Bq m −3 , whereas the 0.7 h −1 tests had the highest combined mean reduction and shortest average response time. Multi-point measurements showed an 18.6% corner-to-center difference under closed-door conditions, indicating spatial non-uniformity within the monitored unit. The first-order mass-balance calculation was retained only as a descriptive setting-level consistency check (combined-mean RMSE 4.37 percentage points; MAE 3.11 percentage points). Effective in situ ACH was not independently verified, and each room-level condition was tested once; therefore, between-setting differences are interpreted within the tested campaign rather than as isolated causal effects of ventilation rate.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Radiological and Ultrasound TechnologyHealth Professions