PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Princeton University Press eBooks· 2015· Book chapter

58. Contingency, Irony and Solidarity

Richard Rorty

Short summary

Richard Rorty's 1989 book argues that thinkers like Nietzsche and Wittgenstein have shown societies they are historical contingencies, not expressions of fixed human nature.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Societies can be viewed as historical contingencies, not fixed entities.
  • An ironic perspective on human existence is beneficial for individuals.
  • Literature, through empathy, promotes social and political solidarity better than philosophy.
  • A liberal culture should integrate private ironic freedom with public solidarity.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

In this 1989 book Rorty argues that thinkers such as Nietzsche, Freud, and Wittgenstein have enabled societies to see themselves as historical contingencies, rather than as expressions of underlying, ahistorical human nature or as realizations of suprahistorical goals. This ironic perspective on the human condition is valuable on a private level, although it cannot advance the social or political goals of liberalism. In fact Rorty believes that it is literature not philosophy that can do this, by promoting a genuine sense of human solidarity. A truly liberal culture, acutely aware of its own historical contingency, would fuse the private, individual freedom of the ironic, philosophical perspective with the public project of human solidarity as it is engendered through the insights and sensibilities of great writers. The book has a characteristically wide range of reference from philosophy through social theory to literary criticism. It confirms Rorty's status as a uniquely subtle theorist, whose writing will prove absorbing to academic and nonacademic readers alike.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Princeton University Press eBooks, 2015 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Philosophy

PhilosophyArts and Humanities