Journal of Cancer Survivorship· 2026Q1
Lived experience leadership in cancer research: a scoping review of conceptual definitions, roles, responsibilities, and impacts
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A scoping review of 12 publications (2015-2025) found lived experience leadership in cancer research is inconsistently defined and rarely involves substantive leadership roles, with only four publications describing such involvement and two using the 'embodied researcher' concept.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Lived experience leadership in cancer research is inconsistently defined and uncommonly reported.
- Most described roles involved feedback on documents, patient materials, and dissemination.
- Only four publications detailed substantive leadership roles for lived experience researchers.
- The 'embodied researcher' concept describes individuals integrating lived and academic expertise to lead research.
- Clearer frameworks and infrastructure are needed to advance and recognize lived experience leadership.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract Background The meaningful integration of lived experience expertise into cancer research is increasingly recognized as essential to improving research relevance, quality, and impact. However, the extent to which people with lived experience of cancer hold leadership roles within academic research remains unclear. This scoping review examined how lived experience leadership is conceptualized, enacted, and reported in cancer research. Methods Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, searches were conducted in Google Scholar, PsycINFO, PubMed, and EMBASE (2015–2025). Eligible publications were peer-reviewed, English-language cancer research articles that described lived experience involvement beyond consultative/participatory methods. Results Twelve publications were included, mostly from the UK and the USA, and focused on adult cancer. Lived experience leadership was typically framed as involvement of “co-researchers” who provided feedback on study documents, advised on patient-facing materials, and contributed to dissemination activities. Four publications described lived experience researchers in substantive leadership roles, and two employed the concept of the “embodied researcher”—described as individuals who draw upon both lived and academic expertise to lead research. Conclusions Lived experience leadership in cancer research remains inconsistently defined and uncommonly reported. Advancing the lived experience leadership in cancer research, and recognition of this leadership, will require clearer frameworks, infrastructure, and recognition of researcher positionality to enable genuine lived experience leadership. Implications for Cancer Survivors This review highlights that while lived experience is increasingly valued in cancer research, survivors are still rarely involved as substantive leaders of cancer research. Strengthening pathways for survivor leadership could help ensure that cancer research is more relevant, equitable, and responsive.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: General Health Professions
General Health ProfessionsHealth Professions