Medical Entomology and Zoology· 2012· Review
The New Testament: The History of the Investigation of Its Problems
- 208citations
- 2012year
Short summary
This review praises Werner Georg Kümmel's book for its comprehensive history of New Testament research, highlighting its organization and use of illustrative material from principal scholars.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- The book covers the history of New Testament research from the 17th century to the present day.
- Key stimuli identified include Textual Criticism and English Deism.
- Major historical approaches discussed are Semler, Michaelis, Strauss, Baur, the History of Religion School, and the Historico-Theological View.
- A significant feature is the extensive use of illustrative material from principal scholars' writings.
- The author provides detailed commentary on interpretive problems, their origins, and scholarly approaches.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
'There can be nothing but praise for the treatment of the subject from the turn of the seventeenth to the eighteenth century up to the present day. Kummel finds the decisive stimuli of New Testament research as we now understand it in Textual Criticism and, interestingly enough, in English Deism. He goes on to trace scientific study from Semler and Michaelis up to the consistently historical approach inaugurated by D. B. Strauss and F. C. Baur. other major developments are grouped under the main headings of The History of Religion School and the HistoricoTheological View. On this broad canvas the detail is superbly organized. Perhaps the outstanding feature of the book is the large amount of illustrative material taken from the writings of the principal scholars whose views are adumbrated and criticized. Behind the selection of material lie great skill and perception. To draw attention to the rich vein of source material is in no way to depreciate Kijmmel's own contribution which sets in context and gives significance to the excerpts. He makes the reader aware of what precisely are the problems of interpretation, how and why they arise when they do, how they are dealt with by this scholar and that, what is the strength and the weakness of each approach and hypothesis. Running commentary and illustrative material are both enhanced by over five hundred comprehensive notes, full indices, and bibliography. Here is an instrument of study for which we have long been looking and can only receive with gratitude' (Marcus Ward in Heythrop Journal).
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Medical Entomology and Zoology, 2012 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Religious studies
Religious studiesArts and Humanities