· 2018
Space, Time, and Perversion
- 665citations
- 2018year
Short summary
This work argues that feminist and cultural analysis have stripped bodies of their specificity, leading to a need for radical reconsideration of bodies and their relationship to transgression.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Feminist and cultural analysis have conceptually 'stripped' bodies of their specificity.
- Theories of Foucault, de Lauretis, Deleuze, Butler, and Lingi are examined.
- The functioning of bodies transforms understandings of space, time, knowledge, and desire.
- The paper moves towards a radical consideration of bodies and perversity.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Exploring the fields of architecture, philosophy, and queer theory, Grosz shows how feminism and cultural analysis have conceptually stripped bodies of their specificity, their corporeality, and the vestigal traces of their production as bodies. She investigates the work of Michel Foucault, Teresa de Lauretis, Gilles Deleuze, Judith Butler and Alphonso Lingi, considering their work by examining the ways in which the functioning of bodies transforms understandings of space and time, knowledge and desire. Grosz moves toward a radical consideration of bodies and their relationship to transgression and perversity.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source., 2018 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Visual Arts and Performing Arts
Visual Arts and Performing ArtsArts and Humanities