Scientific Reports· 2026Q1
The burden of chronic urticaria in Portuguese patients: a patient-reported observational study
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Portuguese chronic urticaria (CU) patients report a substantial burden, with a mean Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) of 12.8 and a mean Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) of 9.0, often experiencing diagnostic delays of 2.7 years.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Portuguese CU patients have a mean UAS7 of 12.8 and a mean DLQI of 9.0.
- The average time to diagnosis for CU in Portugal is 2.7 years.
- Angioedema affects 68.7% of patients, and 47.0% have comorbid allergic conditions.
- Psychological impacts include anxiety (60.6%), frustration (55.6%), and sleep difficulties (35.9%).
- Severe CU patients show significantly higher DLQI scores (12.2) compared to mild-to-moderate cases (8.1).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Chronic urticaria (CU) is characterised by the recurrent appearance of wheals, angioedema, or both, persisting for more than six weeks. Despite its recognised impact on quality of life (QoL), the health and social burden of CU remains poorly characterised in Portugal. This cross-sectional, patient-reported study characterised CU in Portuguese patients recruited through APUrtica, the national patient association, and assessed its personal and social impact. Because more engaged and more severely affected patients were over-represented, estimates were post-stratified by disease severity using the AWARE distribution. The mean Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) was 12.8 (SD 13.6), the mean Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) was 9.0 (SD 6.3), and the mean time to diagnosis was 2.7 years (SD 4.0). Angioedema accompanied CU in 68.7% of patients and 47.0% reported comorbid allergic conditions. Anxiety (60.6%), frustration (55.6%), and sleep difficulties (35.9%) were common. Patients with severe disease had higher DLQI scores than mild-to-moderate patients (12.2 vs. 8.1, p = 0.001). Antihistamines were the most widely used treatment (74.8%), and biologicals were used by 31.3%. In this self-selected sample, these exploratory findings indicate a substantial, multidimensional burden and generate hypotheses about diagnostic delay, psychological impact, and access to care.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Scientific Reports, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Rheumatology
RheumatologyMedicine